top of page

Healthcare Interview Prep

NHS INTERVIEW PREPARATION

Paediatrics Interview Questions & Answers

40 NHS interview questions with model answers · 8 free to read

← All NHS Medical and Dental interview questions

About this NHS interview question bank

To prepare for a paediatrics NHS interview, expect questions on recognising the sick child and escalating early, sepsis and meningitis, weight-based prescribing safety, consent and Gillick competence, child protection medicals and your safeguarding duties, and how you talk with frightened parents and young people. Build short spoken answers around real cases from your own practice, and know GMC Good Medical Practice, the GMC 0-18 guidance, Working Together to Safeguard Children and the RCPCH resources before you walk in.

This bank contains 40 original practice questions with first-person model answers written for doctors applying for paediatric Clinical Fellow and Specialty Doctor posts, including internationally trained doctors starting in the NHS, with a selection pitched at senior specialty doctor and consultant level. It covers acute general paediatrics, the paediatric assessment unit, neonatal on-call, community paediatrics and adolescent health, and every answer is built around a realistic, non-identifying scenario. Each question explains what the panel is really assessing, the points you must hit, the mistakes to avoid and the frameworks worth reading, so you can practise answers that sound like you rather than a textbook.

 

What this question bank covers

  • Motivation for paediatrics
  • Working in UK paediatrics as an international graduate
  • NHS values and child-centred care
  • The sick child and PEWS escalation
  • Sepsis, fever and meningitis
  • Bronchiolitis and winter pressures
  • DKA in children
  • Weight-based prescribing safety
  • Gillick competence, Fraser guidelines and consent
  • Child protection medicals
  • Safeguarding children and adolescents
  • Communicating with parents and young people
  • Neonatal on-call and newborn resuscitation
  • Community paediatrics and neurodevelopmental assessment
  • Adolescent mental health and self-harm
  • Transition to adult services
  • Confidentiality and parental responsibility
  • PSIRF, incidents and Duty of Candour
  • QI, teaching and leadership
  • Resilience after a child death

 

40 NHS interview questions with full model answers. The first 8 are free to read below. Unlock the remaining 32 for £2.99 (12 months' access).

These are original practice questions written to reflect how NHS interviews are run. They are not leaked or official questions, and Healthcare Interview Prep is independent of the NHS.

 

 

Free NHS interview questions and model answers

 

 

Question 1: Why have you chosen a career in paediatrics?

Motivation question  ·  Motivation

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants a genuine, personal reason that goes beyond liking children. They are listening for an understanding that paediatrics means caring for the whole family, for realism about safeguarding and very sick children, and for evidence that you have thought about the breadth of the specialty.

 

Model answer

I'll start with the honest answer, which is that I didn't plan it. As a junior doctor I rotated through paediatrics expecting to find it stressful, and on my second week I was asked to see a six-month-old on the assessment unit whose mum said he just wasn't himself. His observations were only mildly off, but he was quiet in a way that didn't feel right. My registrar listened to my worry, took it seriously, and within the hour we were treating him for sepsis. He went home well a week later. That taught me something I still carry: in children, the history from a parent and your own sense that something is wrong can matter as much as the numbers.

What keeps me in paediatrics is the range of it. In one shift you can be at a delivery, then reassuring the parents of a toddler with a febrile convulsion, then sitting down with a fifteen-year-old to talk about how she's really coping with her diabetes. You have to change the way you speak every half hour, and I enjoy that. I also like that children usually recover well when you get the basics right, early.

I'm not naive about the harder side. I've been involved in safeguarding cases that stayed with me, and I've seen a family lose a child. Those experiences didn't put me off. They made me want to be the kind of paediatrician who is calm, notices the small things and is a steady presence for parents on the worst day of their lives. That's the doctor I'm working to become, and this post is the right next step for that.

 

Why this answer works

The answer opens with a specific clinical moment rather than a cliche, which makes it believable. It shows insight into parental concern and early recognition, celebrates the breadth of the specialty, and acknowledges safeguarding and child death without sounding deterred.

 

Key points to include

  • A real, specific moment that drew you to paediatrics
  • Understanding that you care for the child and the family together
  • The breadth of the specialty: acute, neonatal, community, adolescent
  • Realism about safeguarding and very unwell children
  • A clear link to the post you are applying for

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Saying you simply love children
  • A generic answer that could fit any specialty
  • Leaving parents and carers out entirely
  • Sounding unprepared for the emotional weight of the work

 

NHS values and standards

Compassion; Working together for patients; Improving lives; GMC Good Medical Practice: patients, partnership and communication

 

Further reading

  • GMC Good Medical Practice (2024)
  • RCPCH Progress+ curriculum overview
  • NHS Constitution for England

 

 

Question 2: You are the resident on call overnight and a nurse tells you a two-year-old's PEWS score has risen from 2 to 6 over the last hour. Talk us through what you would do.

Clinical Scenario question  ·  Clinical Scenario

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is testing whether you treat a rising early warning score as a trigger for prompt bedside review and escalation, not a number to be noted. They want a structured ABCDE approach, early senior involvement, awareness of the trend and of parental concern, and clear communication and documentation.

 

Model answer

A rise like that over an hour is a trend, and trends worry me more than any single number, so I'd go and see the child straight away rather than giving advice over the phone. On the way I'd ask the nurse a few quick questions: why the child was admitted, which parameters have changed, whether she or the parents are worried, and whether there's a current weight and any treatment plan or ceiling of care documented.

At the bedside I'd do an ABCDE assessment and start treating as I go. I'd look at work of breathing, saturations and whether oxygen is needed, then heart rate, capillary refill, blood pressure and how warm the peripheries are. I'd check conscious level using AVPU or the paediatric GCS, and always a blood glucose. I'd look at the fluid balance, temperature and the skin for any rash. I'd also ask the parents directly whether their child seems different to them, because a parent saying this isn't my child is a red flag in its own right.

Depending on what I find, I'd act on it immediately: oxygen, IV or IO access, bloods including a gas, lactate and cultures, and if sepsis is a possibility, antibiotics within the hour according to the trust sepsis pathway. Fluid boluses would be weight-based and given with reassessment after each one. Whatever the cause, a score that has jumped like this means I'd call my registrar or the consultant on call early, and I'd ask for help from the outreach or resus team if the child is not responding. I'd rather call too soon than too late.

I'd agree a clear plan with the nurse: what observations, how often, and exactly what change should trigger a call back to me. I'd explain to the parents what's happening in plain language, and remind them they can ask for a review if they're worried, which in England is now part of Martha's Rule. Then I'd document my assessment, the PEWS trend, the escalation and the plan. Many trusts in England are moving to the national paediatric early warning system, so I'd follow whichever chart and escalation thresholds my trust uses.

 

Why this answer works

This answer shows urgency, a systematic ABCDE approach and real-time treatment, while keeping senior escalation central. It also values nursing concern and the parent's voice, and closes the safety loop with a documented plan and clear call-back criteria.

 

Key points to include

  • Go and see the child, do not manage by phone
  • Structured ABCDE assessment including glucose and conscious level
  • Treat as you go, including the sepsis pathway where relevant
  • Early escalation to registrar or consultant
  • Listen to parents and nurses, and mention Martha's Rule or local equivalent
  • Clear observation plan, call-back criteria and documentation

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Asking for repeat observations in an hour without reviewing
  • Focusing on the score and ignoring the trend or parental concern
  • Leaving senior escalation until the child is peri-arrest
  • Forgetting blood glucose or weight-based dosing

 

NHS values and standards

Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; Compassion; GMC Good Medical Practice: recognise and work within the limits of your competence

 

Further reading

  • National Paediatric Early Warning System (PEWS) guidance, NHS England
  • NICE guideline: Suspected sepsis
  • Resuscitation Council UK Paediatric Life Support guidelines
  • Martha's Rule implementation guidance, NHS England

 

 

Question 3: A four-month-old baby is brought to the paediatric assessment unit with a cough, and you notice a small bruise on the cheek. The parents say they are not sure how it happened. What would you do?

Safeguarding question  ·  Safeguarding

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants to see that you recognise any bruise in a non-mobile baby as a sentinel finding that needs a child protection pathway, not a judgement call. They are looking for a calm, non-accusatory manner with parents, early senior and social care involvement, a proper medical assessment and careful documentation.

 

Model answer

The first thing I'd say is that a four-month-old can't roll into things or cruise round furniture, so any bruise in a baby who isn't independently mobile is significant. It doesn't mean someone has harmed this child, but it does mean I follow the trust's bruising in non-mobile infants protocol rather than deciding on my own whether it looks innocent. A small bruise can be the only visible sign before a much more serious injury.

I'd still manage the reason they came in. I'd assess the cough properly, because the baby may be unwell and that matters too. Then I'd fully undress the baby and examine all of the skin, including behind the ears, inside the mouth and the frenulum, and the genital area, with a nurse present. I'd document the bruise on a body map with size, colour and site, and record exactly what the parents said in their own words, with the time.

I'd tell my registrar or the consultant straight away, because the protocol usually needs senior review and a referral to children's social care, and I'd check whether the child or siblings are known to services or have a child protection plan. The consultant would usually lead the child protection medical, and investigations normally include a skeletal survey, neuroimaging when indicated, bloods to look for a bleeding disorder, and an eye examination, all decided by the senior team and local guidance.

With the parents, I'd be honest and calm. I'd explain that whenever we see a bruise on a young baby we follow the same process for every family, which includes some tests and speaking with social care, and that we do this to keep babies safe. I wouldn't accuse or interrogate them. I'd let the nursing team know, make sure the baby isn't discharged until the plan is agreed, and get advice from the named or designated doctor for safeguarding if I was unsure about anything.

 

Why this answer works

The answer shows knowledge of the non-mobile infant bruising principle and the need to follow protocol rather than personal judgement. It balances the presenting illness, a thorough examination, accurate documentation, senior involvement and a respectful, transparent approach to the parents.

 

Key points to include

  • Any bruise in a non-mobile baby is significant
  • Follow the local bruising protocol, not personal judgement
  • Full skin examination with a chaperone and a body map
  • Record the parents' account verbatim, with times
  • Early consultant involvement and referral to children's social care
  • Honest, non-accusatory explanation to parents

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Deciding the bruise is too small to matter
  • Interrogating or accusing the parents
  • Forgetting the presenting complaint or siblings
  • Discharging before a safeguarding plan is agreed

 

NHS values and standards

Everyone counts; Respect and dignity; Commitment to quality of care; GMC 0-18 years guidance; GMC Protecting children and young people

 

Further reading

  • Working Together to Safeguard Children (2023), England
  • NICE guideline: Child maltreatment: when to suspect maltreatment in under 18s
  • RCPCH Child Protection Companion
  • Children Act 1989 and 2004
  • Local bruising in non-mobile infants protocol

 

 

Question 4: A father is angry because his daughter was sent home from the emergency department yesterday and has come back today much sicker. He says nobody listened. How would you handle this?

Communication question  ·  Communication

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants to see that you can stay calm, listen properly and acknowledge a family's experience without becoming defensive or blaming colleagues. They are also checking that you prioritise the child's clinical care, are open about what happened, and know how to escalate concerns and signpost to PALS or the complaints process.

 

Model answer

My first priority would be the child, so I'd make sure she's being assessed and treated before anything else. If I was the one seeing her, I'd tell her dad that I wanted to hear everything but that I'd like to check her first, and then I'd come back and sit down with him properly. Most of the time, a parent's anger comes from fear, and the best way to settle it is to show him straight away that his daughter is being taken seriously now.

Once she was stable, I'd find somewhere quiet and let him talk without interrupting. I'd say something like, I can hear how frightening this has been, and I'm sorry you feel you weren't listened to yesterday. That isn't admitting blame for something I don't know about, it's acknowledging his experience. I wouldn't criticise my colleagues, because I wasn't there and I don't know what she looked like at the time. Illnesses in children can change quickly. But I also wouldn't brush his concern aside.

I'd explain clearly what we think is happening now, what we're doing and what he should expect over the next few hours, and I'd check he understood. I'd ask him what he's most worried about, because often it's something specific I can answer. I'd also make sure he knows he can ask for an urgent review if he's worried at any time, and I'd tell the nurse in charge so the whole team is aware.

Afterwards, I'd let my consultant know, because a return visit with deterioration may need reviewing as a patient safety event under the trust's PSIRF approach. If something did go wrong, the family is entitled to an open explanation under the Duty of Candour. If he wanted to take it further, I'd explain how to contact PALS or make a complaint, without making him feel that was a threat. I'd document the conversation carefully.

 

Why this answer works

The answer keeps the child's safety first, then models empathic listening and an apology for the experience without unfair blame. It shows openness, escalation, awareness of PSIRF and Duty of Candour, and respectful signposting, which is exactly the professional balance panels look for.

 

Key points to include

  • Treat the child first, then come back to talk
  • Listen, acknowledge and apologise for the experience
  • Do not blame colleagues or become defensive
  • Clear explanation of the current plan and how to escalate worries
  • Inform the consultant and consider incident review under PSIRF
  • Signpost to PALS or complaints and document the conversation

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Defending the previous decision or criticising colleagues
  • Talking to the father before making sure the child is safe
  • Promising outcomes you cannot guarantee
  • Treating a complaint as a personal attack

 

NHS values and standards

Respect and dignity; Compassion; Commitment to quality of care; GMC Good Medical Practice: openness and honesty

 

Further reading

  • GMC and NMC: Openness and honesty when things go wrong, the professional duty of candour
  • Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)
  • Martha's Rule implementation guidance, NHS England
  • NHS complaints and PALS guidance

 

 

Question 5: Which of the NHS values matters most to you as a paediatrician, and can you give an example of it in practice?

NHS Values question  ·  NHS Values

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is checking that you know the NHS values and can link one to real behaviour with children and families. They want an example, not a definition, and a sense of why that value is particularly important in paediatrics.

 

Model answer

The NHS values are working together for patients, respect and dignity, commitment to quality of care, compassion, improving lives and everyone counts. In paediatrics, the one I keep coming back to is everyone counts, because children can't always speak up for themselves and some families find it much harder than others to be heard.

An example that stays with me was a boy of about eight with a learning disability and autism who came to the assessment unit with abdominal pain. He was very distressed, wouldn't let anyone near him, and I could hear a colleague say he was just being difficult. His mum told me he only behaved like that when he was in real pain. I asked what usually helped, and she said a quiet room, his tablet and a simple picture explanation of what would happen. We moved him to a side room, the play specialist helped, and I examined him slowly with his mum holding his hand. He had clear right iliac fossa tenderness, and he went on to have an appendicectomy.

What I took from that is that everyone counts isn't about treating every child the same. It's about making reasonable adjustments so every child gets the same quality of care. If we'd treated his distress as behaviour, we could have missed something serious. Since then, I always ask parents of children with additional needs what normal looks like for their child, and I check whether there's a health passport or communication plan.

 

Why this answer works

This answer names the values accurately, then grounds one value in a believable case that shows diagnostic overshadowing being avoided. It links the value to reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act and describes a lasting change in practice.

 

Key points to include

  • Name the NHS values correctly
  • Choose one and explain why it matters in paediatrics
  • A specific, realistic example with a clear outcome
  • Show reasonable adjustments and listening to parents
  • Describe how it changed your practice

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Reciting the values with no example
  • Choosing a value that does not fit the story
  • An example where you are the hero and the team is criticised
  • Forgetting the child's own voice

 

NHS values and standards

Everyone counts; Respect and dignity; Compassion; GMC Good Medical Practice: treat patients fairly

 

Further reading

  • NHS Constitution for England
  • Equality Act 2010: reasonable adjustments
  • GMC Good Medical Practice (2024)
  • NHS England guidance on reasonable adjustments and learning disability

 

 

Question 6: How do you make sure your prescribing is safe for children, and what would you do if you realised you had made a tenfold dosing error?

Patient Safety question  ·  Patient Safety

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants to know that you understand why paediatric prescribing carries extra risk and that you have reliable personal habits to reduce it. They are also checking that if an error happens you put the child first, escalate promptly, report it and are open with the family.

 

Model answer

Children's prescribing is riskier because almost everything is weight-based, the volumes are small, and a misplaced decimal point can mean a tenfold error that would be obvious in an adult but can look plausible in a baby. So I have habits I stick to every time. I use a weight that has actually been measured on this admission, and I write it on the chart. I calculate the dose from the BNF for Children or the local formulary, check it against the maximum, which is often the adult dose for older children, and then check my answer roughly in my head. If I'm prescribing an infusion, I use the trust's standard concentrations rather than making something up.

I write micrograms in full, never use a trailing zero, and avoid abbreviations. For high-risk drugs like gentamicin, insulin, opioids or anything given as an infusion, I'm happy for the nurses and pharmacists to challenge me, and I actually thank them when they do. On night shifts when I'm tired, I slow down rather than speed up.

If I realised I'd made a tenfold error, the first thing would be the child. I'd stop or hold the drug, go and assess the child, and tell my registrar or consultant straight away. I'd get pharmacy advice on the effects and any antidote or monitoring needed, and if there was any sign of harm I'd escalate urgently. Then I'd be honest with the parents. I'd explain what happened, apologise, tell them what we're doing about it, and document the conversation. That's both the professional duty of candour and, where harm meets the threshold, the statutory one.

I'd report it through the trust's incident system so it can be reviewed under PSIRF. It feels uncomfortable to report your own mistake, but the reason tenfold errors keep happening across the NHS is often in the system as well as the individual, such as electronic prescribing defaults or weights not being updated. I'd reflect on it with my supervisor and bring it to my appraisal.

 

Why this answer works

The answer explains why paediatric prescribing is different and gives concrete, credible habits. It then handles the error in the right order: patient safety, escalation, pharmacy advice, honest disclosure, incident reporting and reflection.

 

Key points to include

  • Why paediatric prescribing is high risk
  • Measured weight, BNFc, maximum dose and a sense check
  • No trailing zeros, write micrograms in full, standard infusions
  • Welcome challenge from pharmacy and nursing colleagues
  • If an error happens: child first, escalate, pharmacy, candour
  • Incident reporting under PSIRF and reflection

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Claiming you never make mistakes
  • Hiding or quietly correcting the error
  • Forgetting to tell the family
  • Blaming the nurse who gave the drug

 

NHS values and standards

Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; Respect and dignity; GMC Good Medical Practice: openness and honesty

 

Further reading

  • BNF for Children
  • GMC Good practice in prescribing and managing medicines and devices
  • GMC and NMC: Openness and honesty when things go wrong
  • Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)
  • CQC Regulation 20: Duty of candour

 

 

Question 7: A 14-year-old attends clinic on her own and asks for contraception. She does not want her parents to know. How would you approach this?

Clinical Scenario question  ·  Clinical Scenario

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is testing your knowledge of Gillick competence and the Fraser guidelines, your ability to respect a young person's confidentiality while staying alert to safeguarding risk, and your communication style with adolescents. They want to see that you know the limits of confidentiality and when to seek advice.

 

Model answer

I'd start by making her feel safe to talk. Fourteen-year-olds often find it hard to come in on their own, so I'd thank her for coming and explain early on how confidentiality works: what she tells me stays private, unless I'm worried that she or someone else is at risk of serious harm, in which case I'd talk to her first about who I'd need to tell.

Then I'd assess whether she's Gillick competent for this decision. That means checking she understands what contraception involves, the options, the risks and benefits, and the alternatives, and that she can weigh that up and make her own choice. For contraception specifically, the Fraser guidelines apply. I'd want to be satisfied that she understands the advice, that I can't persuade her to tell her parents or let me tell them, that she's likely to have sex anyway, that her physical or mental health would be likely to suffer without contraception, and that it's in her best interests. I'd gently encourage her to involve a parent or another trusted adult, but I wouldn't make that a condition.

Alongside that, I'd use a HEADSS-style conversation to understand her life, and I'd ask sensitively about the relationship: how old the partner is, whether she feels pressured, whether there's alcohol or drugs involved, whether she's been given gifts or money. A big age gap, coercion or any sign of exploitation would be a safeguarding concern, and I'd discuss it with the safeguarding team. I'd also remember that sexual activity under 13 is always a safeguarding referral, because a child that age cannot consent in law.

If she's competent and there are no safeguarding concerns, I'd provide contraception or refer her to sexual health services, and I'd talk about STI testing and condoms. I'd document my assessment of competence, the Fraser criteria and the safeguarding questions clearly. If I was uncertain at any point, I'd seek advice from my consultant or the named doctor for safeguarding.

 

Why this answer works

This answer combines the legal framework with real communication skill. It explains confidentiality honestly, applies Gillick and Fraser accurately, screens carefully for exploitation, and documents the reasoning, which is the balance between rights and protection the panel wants.

 

Key points to include

  • Explain confidentiality and its limits at the start
  • Assess Gillick competence for this specific decision
  • Apply the Fraser guidelines for contraception
  • Screen for coercion, age gap and exploitation
  • Under 13 always triggers a safeguarding referral
  • Clear documentation and senior advice if unsure

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Insisting on parental involvement
  • Promising absolute confidentiality
  • Not asking about the partner or possible exploitation
  • Confusing Gillick competence with the Fraser guidelines

 

NHS values and standards

Respect and dignity; Compassion; Everyone counts; GMC 0-18 years guidance; GMC Confidentiality guidance

 

Further reading

  • GMC 0-18 years: guidance for all doctors
  • Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA (1985) and the Fraser guidelines
  • Sexual Offences Act 2003
  • Working Together to Safeguard Children (2023)
  • Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare guidance on young people

 

 

Question 8: Tell us about a time you worked closely with the wider team to care for a sick child.

Teamwork question  ·  Teamwork

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants to see that you value nurses, play specialists, pharmacists, allied health professionals and parents as partners, not as people who simply carry out your plans. They are looking for clear roles, good communication and humility.

 

Model answer

One night on the paediatric assessment unit, we had a three-year-old with severe acute asthma who wasn't responding to back-to-back nebulisers. I was the resident, my registrar was in the neonatal unit with a sick baby, and the consultant was on the way in from home. It was a moment where the team mattered far more than any one of us.

The nurse in charge took control of the room. She allocated one nurse to the child, another to observations and the drug chart, and she asked the play specialist, who was still on the unit late that evening, to sit with the child's older brother so mum could stay at the bedside. I focused on the assessment and the treatment plan, and I said out loud what I was doing so everyone could hear and challenge me. I phoned the registrar early and agreed on IV treatment, and the on-call pharmacist helped me check the magnesium dose and the infusion concentration, which on a busy night I really valued.

What made it work was that people spoke up. At one point the nurse said, I don't think his chest is moving as much as it was, and she was right. It was a sign he was tiring, and that led to an earlier call to the anaesthetist and the regional paediatric critical care transport service. He improved enough not to need a transfer in the end, but we were ready.

Afterwards, we had a short debrief and I thanked everyone by name. I learned that being a good doctor in a team isn't about knowing everything. It's about creating a room where a nurse feels comfortable saying I'm worried, and listening when she does.

 

Why this answer works

The answer gives a realistic paediatric emergency in which each team member has a clear role. It shows closed-loop communication, valuing challenge, early escalation and a debrief, which reflects how high-functioning paediatric teams really work.

 

Key points to include

  • A specific, realistic team situation
  • Clear roles across nursing, play, pharmacy and medical staff
  • Speaking your plan aloud and inviting challenge
  • Early escalation to seniors and critical care
  • Including the family and siblings
  • Debrief and what you learned

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Describing yourself as the only decision-maker
  • Leaving out the nursing team's role
  • No outcome or learning
  • Criticising absent seniors

 

NHS values and standards

Working together for patients; Respect and dignity; Commitment to quality of care; GMC Good Medical Practice: working collaboratively with colleagues

 

Further reading

  • GMC Good Medical Practice (2024)
  • BTS/SIGN British guideline on the management of asthma
  • Resuscitation Council UK Paediatric Life Support guidelines

 

 

Unlock 32 more NHS interview questions

You have read the free questions. The full bank adds 32 premium questions for this role, each with a model answer, what the panel is assessing, key points and common mistakes.

One-off payment of £2.99 for 12 months' access. No subscription. Use the Unlock button at the top of this page.

 

To prepare for a paediatrics NHS interview, expect questions on recognising the sick child and escalating early, sepsis and meningitis, weight-based prescribing safety, consent and Gillick competence, child protection medicals and your safeguarding duties, and how you talk with frightened parents and young people. Build short spoken answers around real cases from your own practice, and know GMC Good Medical Practice, the GMC 0-18 guidance, Working Together to Safeguard Children and the RCPCH resources before you walk in.

bottom of page