top of page

Healthcare Interview Prep

NHS INTERVIEW PREPARATION

Intensive Care Medicine Interview Questions & Answers

40 NHS interview questions with model answers · 8 free to read

← All NHS Medical and Dental interview questions

About this NHS interview question bank

To prepare for an intensive care medicine NHS interview, expect questions on how you take referrals and make admission decisions, sepsis and organ support at a principles level, ceilings of care, family meetings, end of life care, organ donation and how you cope with the emotional weight of the work. Build short spoken answers around real cases from your ICU, anaesthetic or acute medicine experience, and know GMC Good Medical Practice, the Mental Capacity Act and the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine's standards before you walk in.

This bank contains 40 original practice questions with first-person model answers written for doctors applying for intensive care posts, pitched mainly at Clinical Fellow and Specialty Doctor level, with a selection aimed at senior Specialty Doctors and those stepping towards Consultant roles. It covers referrals from the ward and emergency department, septic shock, ventilation principles, transfers, withdrawal of treatment, brainstem death testing awareness, organ donation, surge and bed pressures, safeguarding, confidentiality and team wellbeing. Every question explains what the panel is really assessing, the points you must hit, the mistakes to avoid and the frameworks worth reading, so you can practise answers that sound like you rather than a textbook.

 

What this question bank covers

  • Motivation for intensive care medicine
  • NHS values in critical care
  • ICU referrals and admission decisions
  • Ceilings of care and treatment escalation plans
  • Sepsis and septic shock
  • Ventilation and organ support principles
  • Critical care outreach and the deteriorating patient
  • Transfers of critically ill patients
  • Family meetings and difficult conversations
  • End of life care and withdrawal of treatment
  • Organ donation and the specialist nurse role
  • Brainstem death testing awareness
  • Bed pressures and surge
  • Safeguarding in critical care
  • Mental Capacity Act and best interests
  • Confidentiality and relatives
  • Patient safety, PSIRF and learning
  • Quality improvement and teaching
  • Moral distress and team wellbeing
  • FICM and GMC Good Medical Practice

 

40 NHS interview questions with full model answers. The first 8 are free to read below. Unlock the remaining 32 for £2.99 (12 months' access).

These are original practice questions written to reflect how NHS interviews are run. They are not leaked or official questions, and Healthcare Interview Prep is independent of the NHS.

 

 

Free NHS interview questions and model answers

 

 

Question 1: Why do you want to work in intensive care medicine?

Motivation question  ·  Motivation

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants a genuine, personal reason rooted in real experience of critical care, not just a liking for procedures or adrenaline. They are listening for an understanding that intensive care is as much about judgement, communication and end of life care as it is about organ support.

 

Model answer

I think the honest answer is that intensive care is where I feel most useful, and it took me a while to understand why. When I first rotated through the unit as a junior, I assumed the appeal would be the procedures: lines, airways, the monitors. Those are part of it, but what actually hooked me was a night shift where I was called to the ward to see a man in his sixties with pneumonia who was tiring. Within an hour we'd brought him to the unit, started non-invasive ventilation and called his wife in. He did well. But what stayed with me was the conversation my registrar had with his wife that night, explaining calmly what we were doing, what might happen and what we would and wouldn't do if things got worse.

That's when I realised intensive care is really about decisions. Who will benefit from what we can offer, how much is too much, and how we keep the person and their family at the centre when everything is noisy and frightening. I like the physiology, and I like that you can see the effect of what you do in real time, but I value just as much the slower work of sitting with a family and being honest.

I also like the way the unit works as a team. The nurse at the bedside often knows before anyone else that something isn't right, and the best consultants I've worked with listen to that. I want to be that kind of doctor.

I'm not naive about it. I've been involved in withdrawals of treatment that were very hard, and I've had shifts where there were more referrals than beds. Those experiences didn't put me off. They made me want to get better at the judgement side of the job, which is why I'm applying for this post.

 

Why this answer works

The answer moves quickly past procedures to the real heart of the specialty: decision making, communication and teamwork. It uses a specific, believable moment and is honest about the emotional and operational pressures, which reassures the panel the candidate knows what they are signing up for.

 

Key points to include

  • A specific moment from your own ICU or acute experience
  • Understanding that ICM is about judgement and decisions, not only procedures
  • Communication with families as a core skill
  • Respect for the multidisciplinary team, especially bedside nurses
  • Realism about end of life care and bed pressures

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Talking only about adrenaline, procedures or 'saving lives'
  • Giving a generic answer that could apply to emergency medicine or anaesthetics
  • Ignoring the families and the end of life side of the work
  • Sounding unaware of how stressful the job can be

 

NHS values and standards

Compassion; Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; GMC Good Medical Practice: knowledge, skills and development

 

Further reading

  • GMC Good Medical Practice
  • Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) curriculum and careers information
  • Guidelines for the Provision of Intensive Care Services (GPICS), FICM and Intensive Care Society

 

 

Question 2: Which NHS value matters most to you in intensive care, and how have you shown it?

NHS Values question  ·  NHS Values

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is checking that you know the NHS values and can tie one of them to real behaviour on a critical care unit. They want an example rather than a definition, and some reflection on why that value carries particular weight when patients often cannot speak for themselves.

 

Model answer

The NHS values are working together for patients, respect and dignity, commitment to quality of care, compassion, improving lives, and everyone counts. In intensive care I think respect and dignity is the one that's most at risk, because so many of our patients are sedated, intubated and can't speak up for themselves. It's very easy for a bed space to become a set of numbers.

One example that comes to mind was a woman in her forties who'd been ventilated for about a week with pneumonia. She was being lightened from sedation, and on the ward round we stood at the end of the bed discussing her sedation holds and her chest X-ray as though she wasn't there. Her nurse quietly pointed out that she was opening her eyes to voice. I went to the bedside, introduced myself, told her where she was and what day it was, and explained that the tube was helping her breathe and that we were hoping to take it out soon. She squeezed my hand. After that, the round carried on but we spoke to her first.

It made me change a couple of small habits. I always introduce myself to a patient whatever their sedation score, I draw curtains properly for examinations, and I try to learn something about the person from their family, what they did for work, what music they like, so that the team sees a person. Some units use a short 'about me' sheet by the bed and I've found that really helps.

Dignity also matters at the end of life. When treatment is withdrawn, I want the family to have privacy, time and no unnecessary alarms or interruptions. That's part of quality care just as much as getting the ventilator settings right.

 

Why this answer works

The answer names all the values briefly, then focuses on one and shows it in a precise, relatable ICU moment. It ends with concrete changes in behaviour, which demonstrates reflection and makes the value feel lived rather than recited.

 

Key points to include

  • Name the NHS values accurately
  • Choose one and explain why it matters especially in ICU
  • A specific example involving a sedated or vulnerable patient
  • Concrete habits you have changed as a result
  • Link to dignity at the end of life

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Reciting the values without any example
  • Choosing a value but describing a generic ward scenario
  • Forgetting that sedated patients may still hear and understand
  • Overclaiming, for example implying you single-handedly changed the unit's culture

 

NHS values and standards

Respect and dignity; Compassion; Commitment to quality of care; GMC Good Medical Practice: treat patients with dignity

 

Further reading

  • NHS Constitution for England
  • GMC Good Medical Practice
  • GMC Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making

 

 

Question 3: Tell us about a time you spoke to a family about a patient who was deteriorating despite full intensive care treatment.

Communication question  ·  Communication

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants to see that you can lead or support a difficult family conversation with honesty and kindness. They are looking for preparation, plain language, checking understanding, avoiding false hope or abrupt delivery, and knowing when to involve a consultant.

 

Model answer

One I think about often was a man in his seventies with faecal peritonitis after emergency surgery. He'd been on the unit for four days, on high-dose noradrenaline, ventilated, and his kidneys had failed and he was on filtration. Despite everything, his lactate was climbing and he was needing more support each day. The consultant and I agreed the family needed an honest update that afternoon, and the consultant asked me to lead it with her in the room.

Before we went in, we agreed the key message: he was very unwell, he was not responding to treatment, and there was a real chance he would die in the next day or two. We also agreed what we'd say if they asked about stopping treatment, and we brought his nurse with us.

I started by asking his wife and two daughters what they understood. His wife said she thought he was 'turning a corner' because the surgeon had said the operation went well. So I gently explained that the operation had done what it needed to, but the infection had made his whole body very sick, and that the machines were now doing the work of his heart, lungs and kidneys. I said, quite plainly, 'I'm worried he's dying,' and then I stopped talking. That silence was the hardest part, but it gave them space.

His daughter asked whether there was anything else we could do. I was honest that we were already giving everything that might help, and that if he got worse we would not want to put him through CPR, because it wouldn't work and would take away a peaceful death. The consultant supported that and explained the decision was ours as a medical team, but that we wanted to know what he'd have wanted.

We arranged to meet again the next morning, made sure they had a quiet room and a contact number, and I documented the conversation in detail. He died two days later with his family there. His wife later said she was grateful nobody had pretended.

 

Why this answer works

The answer shows preparation, a clear shared message, finding out what the family already know, plain language, silence, and honesty about CPR. It keeps the consultant involved and finishes with practical follow-up and documentation, which is exactly the safe, kind approach a panel wants.

 

Key points to include

  • Prepare with the consultant and nurse and agree the key message
  • Find out what the family already understand
  • Use plain words such as 'dying' rather than euphemisms
  • Allow silence and respond to emotion
  • Be clear that CPR decisions are clinical while seeking the patient's wishes
  • Document and plan follow-up

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Leading a conversation like this without senior involvement at Clinical Fellow level
  • Using jargon such as 'multi-organ failure' without explanation
  • Implying the family must decide whether to stop treatment
  • Offering false hope to avoid upsetting the family

 

NHS values and standards

Compassion; Respect and dignity; Working together for patients; GMC Good Medical Practice: communicate effectively

 

Further reading

  • GMC Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making
  • GMC Decision making and consent
  • Resuscitation Council UK and BMA joint guidance: Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • ReSPECT process guidance

 

 

Question 4: You are called by the medical registrar about a ward patient with suspected septic shock. Talk us through how you would handle the referral.

Clinical Scenario question  ·  Clinical Scenario

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is testing safe, structured thinking: rapid assessment, immediate treatment alongside the decision about admission, appropriate escalation to the ICU consultant and clear communication with the referring team. They also want to see awareness of the patient's wishes and ceiling of care.

 

Model answer

The first thing I'd do on the phone is get a quick, structured picture using SBAR: who the patient is, why they're in, their observations and NEWS2, what's been done so far and what the registrar is worried about. I'd also ask straight away whether there's a treatment escalation plan or a DNACPR decision, and what the patient's baseline function is like. But I wouldn't let that conversation delay me. If the story sounds like septic shock, I'd say I'm coming to see them now.

At the bedside I'd do an ABCDE assessment and make sure the basics of the sepsis bundle are moving in parallel: high-flow oxygen if hypoxic, blood cultures and then antibiotics without delay according to the trust's guideline, a lactate, fluids given as boluses with reassessment after each one, a urine output plan, and a hunt for the source. I'd be asking early whether there's something that needs source control, like an obstructed kidney, an abscess or a perforation, and getting the right team involved.

If the patient remains hypotensive or the lactate stays high despite appropriate fluid, they're likely to need vasopressors, and that means critical care. Some trusts allow peripheral noradrenaline for a short period while a central line is placed, so I'd follow local policy. I'd aim for a mean arterial pressure target, usually around 65, adjusted for the individual.

Alongside all this, I'd speak to the patient if they can talk, and to the family, about what we're worried about and what we're offering. If there's any doubt about whether intensive care is in their interests, for example severe frailty or a known wish to avoid it, I'd discuss that with my consultant before committing, but I wouldn't hold back immediate treatment while we decide.

As a Clinical Fellow or Specialty Doctor I would always inform the ICU consultant about a patient I'm admitting or declining. Finally, I'd document a clear plan, agree who's doing what with the ward team, and make sure outreach is aware if the patient stays on the ward for any time.

 

Why this answer works

The answer is structured, safe and practical: SBAR, early bedside review, the sepsis bundle in parallel, fluid reassessment, source control, vasopressors and a sensible MAP target. It integrates ceiling of care thinking without delaying treatment and keeps the consultant informed, which shows good judgement at grade.

 

Key points to include

  • Structured telephone referral with SBAR and NEWS2
  • Go and see the patient promptly; ABCDE assessment
  • Sepsis bundle in parallel: cultures, antibiotics, lactate, fluid with reassessment, urine output
  • Early source control and involvement of the right team
  • Vasopressors and admission if shock persists, following local policy
  • Ceiling of care, patient wishes and consultant involvement

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Making the admission decision over the phone without seeing the patient
  • Delaying antibiotics or fluids while debating admission
  • Giving large fixed fluid volumes without reassessment
  • Not informing the ICU consultant about an admission or refusal

 

NHS values and standards

Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; Everyone counts; GMC Good Medical Practice: provide good clinical care

 

Further reading

  • NICE guideline: Suspected sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management
  • Royal College of Physicians National Early Warning Score (NEWS2)
  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign international guidelines
  • UK Sepsis Trust resources
  • Your trust's sepsis and peripheral vasopressor policies

 

 

Question 5: A decision has been made to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. What is your role in making sure this happens well?

Clinical Scenario question  ·  Clinical Scenario

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants to know that you understand withdrawal of treatment as active, planned end of life care, not simply 'stopping'. They are looking for attention to the family, symptom control, practical steps, documentation, organ donation referral and team support.

 

Model answer

I think the most important thing to say is that withdrawing treatment isn't the moment we stop caring. It's the moment the focus of our care changes, and it deserves the same planning as any procedure.

By the time we get to withdrawal, the consultant will usually have led the decision and the family meeting. My role as a Clinical Fellow or Specialty Doctor is to make sure what follows is calm, comfortable and dignified. First, I check the basics: that the decision and the reasons are clearly documented, that there's a DNACPR decision recorded, and that we've referred to the specialist nurse for organ donation, because that referral should happen before treatment is withdrawn whatever we think the outcome might be.

Then I sit down with the bedside nurse and agree a plan. Who does the family want present? Are there religious or cultural needs, such as a chaplain or particular prayers? Is there a time that matters to them, like waiting for a son to arrive from abroad? I'd prescribe medication to manage breathlessness, agitation and secretions according to the unit's end of life protocol, with doses titrated to symptoms rather than given to hasten death. We'd stop unnecessary monitoring, blood tests and infusions, switch off alarms and move the family's chairs close to the bed.

When it comes to the ventilator, units differ on whether they extubate or reduce support gradually, so I'd follow the plan the consultant has agreed and explain to the family what they might see, such as changes in breathing or colour, so they're not frightened.

Afterwards I'd make sure the death is verified and certified properly, the medical examiner is involved, and the family know what happens next. I'd also check on the nurse, because these shifts can be very heavy.

The one I remember best is a young man after a cardiac arrest. His mother asked us to play his favourite music. It was a small thing, but it made the room feel like his.

 

Why this answer works

The answer reframes withdrawal as active care and covers the key practical and ethical steps: documentation, organ donation referral before withdrawal, symptom control with appropriate intent, family preparation, local practice for extubation and post-death processes. It ends with a human touch and team support.

 

Key points to include

  • Withdrawal is a change in the goal of care, not stopping care
  • Clear documentation of the decision and DNACPR
  • Referral to the specialist nurse for organ donation before withdrawal
  • Symptom-led medication, not intended to hasten death
  • Prepare the family and respect cultural and religious needs
  • Verification, certification, medical examiner and staff support

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Describing withdrawal as purely technical: turning off machines
  • Forgetting the organ donation referral
  • Suggesting medication is used to speed up death
  • Ignoring the family's practical and spiritual needs

 

NHS values and standards

Compassion; Respect and dignity; Commitment to quality of care; GMC Good Medical Practice; GMC Treatment and care towards the end of life

 

Further reading

  • GMC Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making
  • FICM and Intensive Care Society guidance on care at the end of life in critical care
  • NICE guidance on organ donation for transplantation
  • NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) organ donation referral guidance
  • Your trust's end of life care and medical examiner processes

 

 

Question 6: How do you work with the nursing team on an intensive care unit?

Teamwork question  ·  Teamwork

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants evidence that you value the expertise of critical care nurses and see them as partners, not as people who carry out your instructions. They want examples of listening, shared decision making and respectful communication.

 

Model answer

In intensive care the nurse is with one or two patients for twelve hours, and I might be looking after twelve or more. So in practice, the nurse often knows the patient better than I do on any given shift. I try to work on that basis.

At the start of a shift I like to catch each nurse at the bedside during or after handover and ask, 'What are you worried about?' That question often brings out the things that don't appear in the numbers: the patient who seems more agitated than yesterday, or a family member who's struggling. On the ward round I make sure the nurse is part of the discussion rather than standing behind us, and I'll read back the plan with them so we both agree what's happening and what the triggers for calling me are.

A good example was a night where a nurse told me she wasn't happy with a post-operative patient whose observations looked broadly fine. She said he was 'just not right' and his drain output had changed colour. I went straight in, examined him and agreed something was wrong, and we called the surgical team. He went back to theatre that night with an anastomotic leak. If I'd brushed her off because the numbers were OK, it could have been much worse.

I also try to make life easier in small ways: writing clear prescriptions for infusions with the right concentration, not ordering unnecessary bloods at four in the morning, helping turn or reposition a patient when I'm free, and thanking people at the end of a hard shift.

When there are disagreements, which do happen, for example about sedation or about whether to escalate, I try to talk them through at the bedside, explain my reasoning and listen to theirs. If we still disagree, we involve the nurse in charge or the consultant. I've learned more from experienced ICU nurses than from almost anyone else.

 

Why this answer works

The answer shows a clear understanding of the nurse's role and gives a concrete example where listening changed the outcome. It also covers everyday respect, practical helpfulness and a mature approach to disagreement.

 

Key points to include

  • Recognise the bedside nurse's continuous knowledge of the patient
  • Ask what the nurse is worried about and include them in rounds
  • Agree clear plans and escalation triggers
  • A real example where nursing concern changed management
  • Practical respect: clear prescriptions, helping out, thanks
  • Resolving disagreement through discussion and escalation

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Describing nurses as people who follow your plan
  • Giving no specific example
  • Implying you only trust objective observations
  • Ignoring how to handle disagreement

 

NHS values and standards

Working together for patients; Respect and dignity; Commitment to quality of care; GMC Good Medical Practice: working with colleagues

 

Further reading

  • GMC Good Medical Practice
  • Guidelines for the Provision of Intensive Care Services (GPICS)
  • Intensive Care Society and Critical Care Networks National Nurse Leads (CC3N) standards for nurse staffing

 

 

Question 7: Tell us about a mistake you made and what you learned from it.

Patient Safety question  ·  Patient Safety

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants honesty, insight and evidence that you put patient safety first: recognising the error, acting to limit harm, being open with the patient or family, reporting it and learning. They are wary of candidates who choose a trivial mistake or blame others.

 

Model answer

This happened when I was fairly new to the unit. I was asked to prescribe potassium replacement for a ventilated patient whose potassium had dropped after diuresis. I wrote it up as an intravenous bolus in the format I'd used in another hospital, but this unit had a standard concentrated preparation given only via a central line through a pump, and my prescription wasn't clear about the route, concentration or rate.

The nurse caught it before anything was given. She came to me and said, very calmly, that she couldn't give it as written. My first feeling was embarrassment, and honestly a bit of a sinking feeling, because I knew how dangerous concentrated potassium can be. I thanked her, cancelled the prescription and rewrote it properly using the unit's protocol, checking it with her.

Even though no harm came to the patient, I completed an incident report that afternoon, because it was a near miss and I thought it might be a system issue as much as an individual one. I also told my consultant. When the incident was reviewed, it turned out that the electronic prescribing system allowed free-text potassium prescriptions, and a couple of other doctors new to the unit had done something similar. The pharmacist worked with the unit to create a set of standard order sets for electrolyte replacement, which removed the option for an ambiguous prescription.

What I learned was twofold. Personally, when I move to a new unit I now make a point of learning their standard infusion concentrations and protocols in my first week, and I don't assume what was safe somewhere else is safe here. And more broadly, it showed me the value of reporting near misses. If I'd just corrected it quietly, the order set might never have been changed.

Under PSIRF, the focus is on learning rather than blame, and that's how it felt. It made me much more willing to speak up about my own errors.

 

Why this answer works

The candidate chooses a genuine and clinically relevant mistake, describes their feelings honestly and shows the right sequence: stop harm, thank the colleague, report, inform senior, learn. The system-level change shows understanding of how reporting improves safety, and the PSIRF link is accurate.

 

Key points to include

  • A real, clinically relevant mistake
  • Immediate action to prevent harm
  • Honesty with colleagues and seniors, and with the patient if harm occurred
  • Incident reporting, including near misses
  • Personal learning and system learning
  • A just, learning culture under PSIRF

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Choosing a mistake that is not really a mistake
  • Blaming the nurse, the system or others
  • Not reporting a near miss
  • Showing no change in your own practice afterwards

 

NHS values and standards

Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; GMC Good Medical Practice: openness and honesty; Professional duty of candour

 

Further reading

  • NHS Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)
  • GMC and NMC Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour
  • Your trust's medicines policy and intravenous potassium guidance
  • Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and Intensive Care Society safety resources

 

 

Question 8: A surgical consultant insists their patient needs an ICU bed after surgery, but you feel the patient is unlikely to benefit. How would you handle this?

Conflict question  ·  Conflict

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is assessing how you manage disagreement with senior colleagues from another specialty respectfully and safely, keeping the patient's interests at the centre. They want to see you gather information, involve your own consultant, consider the patient's wishes and avoid either caving in or digging in.

 

Model answer

The first thing I'd remind myself is that we both want the best for the patient, and the surgeon may know things I don't. So rather than taking a position on the phone, I'd try to understand their reasoning. Why do they feel ICU is needed? What is the planned operation, what are the risks, and what are they hoping critical care will add?

Then I'd want to see the patient myself, read the notes and talk to the patient if they're able. Things I'd consider include their baseline function and frailty, their other illnesses, their own goals and wishes, and whether there's a reasonable chance that organ support would get them to an outcome they would value. Sometimes what looks like a poor candidate on paper turns out to be a very independent person with a clear wish to try. Other times, the honest picture is that we'd be prolonging dying.

As a Specialty Doctor I wouldn't make a contested decision like this on my own. I'd discuss it with the ICU consultant, and if there's still disagreement, I'd suggest a direct conversation between the two consultants, ideally before surgery rather than at the end of the operation. That conversation might lead to a middle ground, for example admission for a time-limited trial of organ support with clear goals and a review point agreed in advance, and a clear ceiling of care, such as no CPR or no renal replacement therapy.

Throughout, I'd stay respectful. I wouldn't argue in front of the patient or on the ward, and I'd document the discussion, the reasoning and the agreed plan carefully. If the patient has capacity, they should be part of this. GMC guidance is clear that we don't have to provide treatment that isn't clinically appropriate, but patients have a right to have their views heard and to be told honestly what we can and can't offer.

I had a version of this happen once, and the time-limited trial meant everyone, including the family, knew what we were aiming for. It defused a lot of tension.

 

Why this answer works

The answer models curiosity rather than confrontation, a proper assessment of the patient, and escalation to consultant-to-consultant discussion. It offers a practical compromise in time-limited trials and anchors the response in GMC guidance and the patient's own wishes.

 

Key points to include

  • Seek to understand the surgeon's reasoning
  • Assess the patient yourself, including frailty, wishes and likely outcome
  • Involve your ICU consultant; encourage consultant-to-consultant discussion
  • Consider a time-limited trial with clear goals and a ceiling of care
  • Involve the patient and family; document thoroughly
  • Stay professional and respectful

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Refusing over the phone without seeing the patient
  • Agreeing simply to avoid conflict
  • Making a contested decision without your consultant
  • Arguing in front of the patient or ward staff

 

NHS values and standards

Working together for patients; Everyone counts; Respect and dignity; GMC Good Medical Practice: working with colleagues

 

Further reading

  • GMC Treatment and care towards the end of life: good practice in decision making
  • GMC Decision making and consent
  • Royal College of Surgeons and FICM guidance on the high-risk surgical patient
  • Guidelines for the Provision of Intensive Care Services (GPICS)

 

 

Unlock 32 more NHS interview questions

You have read the free questions. The full bank adds 32 premium questions for this role, each with a model answer, what the panel is assessing, key points and common mistakes.

One-off payment of £2.99 for 12 months' access. No subscription. Use the Unlock button at the top of this page.

 

To prepare for an intensive care medicine NHS interview, expect questions on how you take referrals and make admission decisions, sepsis and organ support at a principles level, ceilings of care, family meetings, end of life care, organ donation and how you cope with the emotional weight of the work. Build short spoken answers around real cases from your ICU, anaesthetic or acute medicine experience, and know GMC Good Medical Practice, the Mental Capacity Act and the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine's standards before you walk in.

bottom of page