Interventional Cardiology Interview Questions & Answers
40 original practice questions. Read the first 8 free, then unlock all 40 for £4.99.
← All NHS Medical and Dental interview questions
Last updated 24 October 2026 · Created by a practising NHS doctor · Independent of the NHS
Quick answer
What questions are asked in an NHS Interventional Cardiology interview?
NHS Interventional Cardiology interviews usually mix values-based questions with scenarios specific to the role. Typical themes include motivation for interventional cardiology, primary PCI on call, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and post-ROSC care, complications and tamponade and access site bleeding. Every interview panel writes its own questions, so practise the themes rather than memorising answers. The 8 free questions on this page cover a spread of them.
At a glance
Role: Interventional Cardiology (NHS Medical and Dental)
Questions: 40 original practice questions, each with a full model answer
Free to read: the first 8 questions and answers on this page
Full bank: £4.99, 12 months of access, no subscription
Independent: not affiliated with or endorsed by the NHS
Read 8 questions in full, free, and see exactly what you get before you pay. Unlock the other 32 for £4.99. One payment, 12 months of access, no subscription. Secure checkout through Stripe.
These are original practice questions written to reflect how NHS interviews are run. They are not leaked or official questions, and Healthcare Interview Prep is independent of the NHS.
Free NHS interview questions and model answers
Question 1: Why have you chosen interventional cardiology, and why do you want to work in this heart attack centre?
Motivation question · Motivation
What the interview panel is assessing
The panel wants a genuine reason for choosing a demanding procedural specialty, and evidence that you understand this centre: its primary PCI network, its case mix, its on call pattern and its surgical and imaging links. They are also judging whether you will commit to the rota, the audit culture and the team.
Model answer
It started for me as a core trainee, on a night when I was the medical registrar's shadow and a man in his fifties came straight from the ambulance to the lab with an inferior STEMI. He was grey, sweating and convinced he was dying. Forty minutes later he was sitting up, pink, apologising to the nurses for swearing at them. I had never seen a treatment change someone's trajectory that quickly, and I have chased that feeling ever since.
Since then, what has kept me in the specialty is less the drama and more the decision making around it. I enjoy the physiology, the imaging, and the fact that a good outcome depends on the whole system: the paramedic who recognises the ECG, the physiologist who spots the rhythm change, the radiographer who keeps the dose down and the nurse who notices the patient has gone quiet. As a registrar I have done the full range of on call work, and I have learned that the hardest calls are often the ones where the right answer is not to go to the lab.
I chose to apply here for specific reasons. You run a busy 24 hour primary PCI service for a large network of district general hospitals and ambulance services, so I would see a broad range of presentations, including shock and out of hospital arrest. You have on site cardiac surgery and a weekly heart team meeting, which matters to me because I want my complex decisions tested by surgeons and imagers. I also read your published door to balloon data and the work your nurses did on radial first access, and when I visited the lab the team briefing was genuinely interactive, not a box ticking exercise.
I will be honest that I still have things to learn, particularly in complex bifurcation work and intravascular imaging, and I would want structured supervision in those. But I am ready for the responsibility of independent on call decisions, I am comfortable being audited, and I would like to contribute to the network as well as to the lab.
Why this answer works
This answer starts with one vivid, believable moment and then moves quickly to mature reasons: systems thinking, decision making, and knowing when not to intervene. It shows real research into the centre and an honest learning need. Swap in your own formative case and the specific features of the unit you are applying to, such as its network size or surgical links.
Key points to include
- A specific, personal origin story told briefly
- Mature reasons beyond procedural excitement
- Evidence of research into this centre's service and data
- Recognition that outcomes depend on the whole team
- An honest development need and commitment to the rota
Common mistakes to avoid
- Talking only about the adrenaline of the lab
- An answer that could apply to any cardiac centre
- Overclaiming independence or case numbers
- Ignoring the network, surgical and audit context
NHS values and standards
Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; Improving lives. GMC Good Medical Practice: Knowledge, skills and development.
Further reading
- NHS Constitution for England
- GMC Good Medical Practice
- British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) guidance and audit reports
- JRCPTB Cardiology Specialty Training Curriculum
Question 2: You are the interventional cardiologist on call and an ambulance crew transmits an ECG showing an anterior STEMI from a patient 50 minutes away. Can you talk us through what you would do?
Scenario question · Primary PCI
What the interview panel is assessing
The panel is assessing whether you can run the primary PCI pathway safely and quickly: accepting the call, confirming the diagnosis, activating the team, planning for complications and communicating clearly. They want structured thinking, awareness of time to reperfusion, and good use of the cath lab team rather than heroics.
Model answer
The first thing I do is look at the transmitted ECG myself while the crew is still on the line. I want to confirm ST elevation in a coronary distribution, look for reciprocal change, and make sure there is nothing suggesting a mimic such as pericarditis or an old aneurysm pattern. I take a short SBAR history from the paramedic: time of symptom onset, haemodynamics, rhythm, any arrest, whether the patient is anticoagulated, allergies and anything that changes the plan, such as a known frailty or advance decision.
If it is a STEMI I accept the patient directly to the lab, bypassing the emergency department, and ask the crew to give the loading medications set out in our network protocol. I activate the on call team through switchboard so that the nurse, physiologist and radiographer are travelling at once, and I document the call time because door to balloon and call to balloon times are recorded in our audit and they matter for the patient.
While they travel I think ahead. I check the electronic record for previous angiograms, renal function or prior grafts. I plan radial access unless there is a reason not to, and I think about what could go wrong: an anterior infarct can deteriorate into shock or VF, so I want the defibrillator ready and I want to know which anaesthetist and which intensive care team to call. If the patient arrives unstable I will take an ABCDE approach with the team before we start, rather than rushing to the table.
When the patient arrives I do a brief team huddle and the safety pause, confirm consent in a proportionate way given the urgency, and then proceed with culprit vessel PCI. Afterwards I document clearly, speak to the family, hand over to the coronary care team with a plan for secondary prevention and any staged procedure, and make sure the referring crew get feedback if there was anything unusual.
Why this answer works
This answer works because it is sequential and practical: verify the ECG, gather focused information, activate the team, anticipate complications and close the loop afterwards. It mentions timing and audit without quoting figures the candidate might get wrong. Replace the details with a real on call you have managed, including any delay or diagnostic doubt you resolved.
Key points to include
- Personally review the ECG and take a focused SBAR handover
- Direct to lab activation following the network protocol
- Anticipate shock, arrhythmia and airway needs before arrival
- Team huddle and safety pause even under time pressure
- Clear documentation, family communication and CCU handover
Common mistakes to avoid
- Accepting without looking at the ECG or considering mimics
- Forgetting anticoagulant status or allergies
- Describing the procedure but not the team and system
- Skipping the safety pause because it is an emergency
- Quoting specific drug doses rather than following protocol
NHS values and standards
Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; Everyone counts. GMC Good Medical Practice: Patients, partnership and communication.
Further reading
- NICE guideline NG185: Acute coronary syndromes
- ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes (2023)
- Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP), NICOR
Question 3: During primary PCI, shortly after stent deployment, the patient becomes hypotensive and agitated, and you see contrast outside the vessel. How do you manage this?
Clinical question · Complications
What the interview panel is assessing
The panel is testing recognition and management of coronary perforation with possible tamponade, but more importantly your crisis leadership: calling for help early, allocating roles, communicating with the team and keeping the patient safe. They want principle level steps and awareness of when surgical support is needed.
Model answer
My immediate thought would be coronary perforation with developing tamponade, and I would say that out loud so the whole team is working on the same problem. I would call for help straight away: a second operator if available, the anaesthetist and, depending on the centre, cardiac surgery to be made aware early. I would ask the nurse to note the time and start scribing, and the physiologist to call out pressures and rhythm.
The first technical step is to seal the leak, usually by inflating a balloon at the site of perforation to stop ongoing bleeding into the pericardium, while the team supports the circulation with fluids and vasopressors per the anaesthetist's direction. I would ask for a bedside echo to confirm an effusion, and if there is tamponade physiology I would proceed to pericardiocentesis, which is something I am trained to do in the lab. I would think carefully about anticoagulation, discussing reversal with the team if appropriate, and I would weigh up definitive options such as a covered stent or, for a distal wire perforation, embolisation, depending on the anatomy and what the lab has available.
Throughout, I would keep communication calm and closed loop: I ask for one thing, it is repeated back, and it is confirmed when done. If the leak cannot be controlled, the surgical team needs to be in the room or the patient needs to go to theatre, and I would rather make that call early than late.
Afterwards I would make sure the patient is monitored closely on the coronary care unit with repeat echo, speak openly to the patient and family about what happened, which is part of my duty of candour, and record it through our incident reporting system. I would also want a team debrief that day, because complications like this affect staff and they are a chance to learn whether anything in the case selection, equipment or technique could change.
Why this answer works
This answer names the problem early, prioritises calling for help and sealing the leak, and describes definitive options at principle level. It covers communication, candour and debrief, which panels value as much as technique. Use a real complication you have managed or assisted with, and be honest about your level of independence.
Key points to include
- Name the likely diagnosis aloud to align the team
- Call for help early, including anaesthetics and surgery
- Seal the leak and support the circulation
- Echo and pericardiocentesis if tamponade
- Candour, incident reporting and team debrief afterwards
Common mistakes to avoid
- Trying to fix it alone without calling for help
- Jumping to technical detail and forgetting haemodynamic support
- Omitting the conversation with the patient and family
- Not considering surgical backup until too late
NHS values and standards
Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; Respect and dignity. GMC Good Medical Practice: Safety and quality.
Further reading
- BCIS guidance on complications and emergency cardiac surgical cover
- GMC: Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour
- Resuscitation Council UK Adult Advanced Life Support guidelines
Question 4: How do you approach consent for elective PCI, and what does informed consent mean to you after the 2015 UK Supreme Court ruling on consent?
Values question · Consent
What the interview panel is assessing
The panel wants to know whether you see consent as a shared conversation rather than a form, and whether you understand material risk, alternatives including medical therapy and surgery, and the patient's own priorities. They are also checking awareness of capacity and of doing consent in good time, not on the trolley.
Model answer
For me, consent starts well before the patient arrives in the lab. Ideally the conversation happens in clinic or on the ward, with time for questions, and on the day I am confirming that understanding rather than starting from scratch. A patient lying on a trolley in a gown, already cannulated, is not in a good position to weigh up options.
Since the 2015 Supreme Court consent ruling, the test is not what a reasonable doctor would mention but what this particular patient would want to know, and what any reasonable person in their position would consider significant. So I start by asking what they understand about their condition and what they hope the procedure will achieve. For stable angina that matters a great deal, because PCI improves symptoms but for many patients it does not reduce the risk of death or heart attack compared with good medical therapy. If someone thinks a stent will make them live longer, I need to correct that kindly.
I then explain the realistic alternatives: continuing or optimising medication, PCI, and for some anatomy, bypass surgery, which may have been discussed at heart team. I go through the common and the serious risks in plain language, including bleeding and access site problems, stroke, kidney injury from contrast, the need for emergency surgery and the rare risk of death, and I tailor what I emphasise to the person. A musician might want to hear about radial artery occlusion, someone with kidney disease about contrast. I also explain the need for antiplatelet therapy afterwards, because that affects plans such as upcoming surgery.
I check understanding by asking them to tell me back what matters to them, I document the discussion rather than just the risks list, and I give written information. If I have any doubt about capacity I assess it formally under the Mental Capacity Act. And I make it clear that saying no, or wanting more time, is completely acceptable.
Why this answer works
This answer shows a modern understanding of consent: timing, patient-specific material risk, honest framing of prognostic benefit, and alternatives including surgery and medicines. The examples of tailoring risk to the person make it feel real. Replace them with an example from your own consent practice, ideally one where a patient's priorities changed the conversation.
Key points to include
- Consent as a process, ideally before the day of the procedure
- the 2015 Supreme Court consent ruling: what this patient would consider significant
- Honest about symptom versus prognostic benefit in stable disease
- Alternatives including medical therapy and surgery
- Check understanding, document the discussion, assess capacity if in doubt
Common mistakes to avoid
- Reciting a list of percentages without context
- Consenting on the trolley as routine
- Overstating the benefit of PCI in stable angina
- Not mentioning alternatives or the right to decline
NHS values and standards
Respect and dignity; Everyone counts; Compassion. GMC Good Medical Practice: Patients, partnership and communication.
Further reading
- GMC: Decision making and consent (2020)
- UK Supreme Court ruling on consent (2015) (2015)
- Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice
- ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes (2024)
Found these useful? The other 32 questions cover the rest of the role, each with a full model answer. Unlock all 40 for £4.99.
Question 5: Tell us about a time you worked closely with the cath lab team to manage a difficult case. What was your role and what did you learn?
Competency question · Teamwork
What the interview panel is assessing
The panel is assessing whether you value and draw on the expertise of nurses, physiologists and radiographers, and whether you communicate in a way that keeps everyone safe. They want a clear STAR example, evidence of shared situational awareness and reflection on how the team, not just the operator, achieved the outcome.
Model answer
During my registrar year we had an elderly woman come in out of hours with a STEMI, already in complete heart block and hypotensive. The lab team that night was a senior cardiac physiologist, an experienced cath lab nurse, a fairly new radiographer and me as the first operator, with my consultant on the way in.
The task was to get her reperfused quickly while managing her rhythm and blood pressure, and I knew I could not hold all of that in my head at once. So before we scrubbed I did a thirty second huddle. I said what I thought the culprit was likely to be, that the priority was a temporary pacing wire, and I asked the physiologist to own the rhythm and pressures and tell me immediately about any change. I asked the nurse to manage drugs and keep a running time log, and I checked with the radiographer that she was comfortable with the projections and settings, because I could see she was new.
During the case the physiologist noticed a subtle loss of capture before I did and called it out, and the nurse suggested we start a vasopressor while I was focusing on the wire. Both were right. The radiographer flagged that our dose was climbing during pacing wire positioning and suggested a lower frame rate, which I accepted. We opened a right coronary occlusion, rhythm recovered, and she went to the coronary care unit stable.
The result was a good outcome, but what I took away was how much the huddle mattered. Assigning ownership meant people spoke up without waiting to be asked. Since then I do a brief huddle on every emergency case, I make a point of asking new staff by name whether they have concerns, and I always thank the team specifically, not generically, at the end.
Why this answer works
This answer uses a clear STAR structure and shows the candidate creating psychological safety: assigning roles, inviting challenge and acting on it. The details of who noticed what make it believable and show humility. Replace it with your own case, focusing on what other professionals contributed and what you changed in your practice afterwards.
Key points to include
- A concrete, high-pressure case with a clear situation
- Explicit role allocation before starting
- Examples of team members speaking up and you acting on it
- Attention to radiation and new staff
- A specific change in your practice afterwards
Common mistakes to avoid
- Telling a story in which you alone saved the day
- Vague references to great teamwork with no detail
- No reflection or learning
- Ignoring the contribution of non-medical colleagues
NHS values and standards
Working together for patients; Respect and dignity; Commitment to quality of care. GMC Good Medical Practice: Colleagues, culture and safety.
Further reading
- GMC Good Medical Practice
- National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures 2 (NatSSIPs 2)
- Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017
Question 6: You notice that a senior colleague regularly skips the team safety pause in the cath lab, saying it slows things down. What would you do?
Scenario question · Raising concerns
What the interview panel is assessing
The panel is assessing your understanding of procedural safety standards and your willingness to raise concerns proportionately with a senior colleague. They want to see that you would act, start with a respectful direct conversation, escalate through the right routes if needed and keep the focus on patients rather than personalities.
Model answer
I would take it seriously, because the safety pause exists precisely for the moments when everyone feels confident. Wrong side access, missed allergies and unrecognised anticoagulation are exactly the kind of errors it catches, and skipping it also tells the rest of the team that their voice is not needed.
In the moment, if I was in the room, I would simply ask for the pause myself: something like, before we start can we just do the time out, it will take thirty seconds. Framing it as routine rather than a challenge usually works, and it gives the nurse or radiographer cover to do the same. I would never let a case start where I had a specific safety worry because of hierarchy.
I would then find a private moment to talk to the colleague directly. I would be curious rather than accusatory: ask why they feel it slows things, acknowledge that in a primary PCI time matters, and explain that our local standards based on NatSSIPs 2 expect the pause for every invasive procedure, and that the team value it. Often the issue is how the checklist is run, so I might suggest we work together to make it quicker and more meaningful, perhaps by focusing on the few items that really matter.
If the behaviour continued, I would escalate. I would speak to the lab manager and the clinical lead, and if there had been a near miss I would report it through our incident system so it can be learned from under PSIRF. If I felt the concern was not being heard, I know I could go to the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian. Throughout, I would keep notes, stay factual, and remember that raising concerns is a professional duty under Good Medical Practice, not a personal criticism. I would also want to support the nurses and radiographers, who may have felt unable to speak up.
Why this answer works
This answer moves through a sensible ladder: act in the moment, have a respectful private conversation, then escalate formally. It shows understanding of why the pause matters and of the hierarchy that makes others reluctant to speak. Swap in a real example where you raised a concern with a senior colleague, even if the topic was different.
Key points to include
- Explain why the safety pause matters in procedural work
- Call for the pause yourself in the moment
- Private, curious conversation with the colleague
- Escalate to lab manager, clinical lead or incident reporting if it persists
- Freedom to Speak Up as a further route
Common mistakes to avoid
- Doing nothing because the colleague is senior
- Going straight to formal complaint without talking first
- Making it personal rather than about patient safety
- Forgetting the impact on the wider team
NHS values and standards
Commitment to quality of care; Respect and dignity; Working together for patients. GMC Good Medical Practice: Colleagues, culture and safety.
Further reading
- National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures 2 (NatSSIPs 2)
- GMC: Raising and acting on concerns about patient safety
- NHS England Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)
- National Guardian's Office: Freedom to Speak Up
Question 7: You are called about a patient resuscitated from an out of hospital cardiac arrest who is now ventilated with no ST elevation on the post-ROSC ECG. Would you take them straight to the lab?
Clinical question · Out of hospital cardiac arrest
What the interview panel is assessing
The panel is testing whether you understand current evidence on immediate angiography after cardiac arrest without ST elevation, and whether you can make an individualised, team-based decision. They also want awareness of prognosis, neuroprotection, capacity and the best interests of a patient who cannot speak for themselves.
Model answer
Not automatically. If the post-ROSC ECG shows no ST elevation, the randomised evidence, including COACT and TOMAHAWK, did not show a benefit from routine immediate angiography compared with a delayed or selective strategy. So my starting point is a careful assessment rather than a reflex trip to the lab.
I would want to understand the arrest: was it witnessed, was there bystander CPR, what was the initial rhythm, how long until ROSC, and what was happening beforehand. Chest pain before collapse, a shockable rhythm and a clear ischaemic picture push me towards a coronary cause. I would look at the ECG again for subtle changes and posterior involvement, review the echo for regional wall motion abnormality, and think about other causes such as pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection, intracranial haemorrhage or a primary arrhythmia. A CT may be more urgent than angiography.
I would discuss the patient jointly with the intensive care team, because their priorities around ventilation, temperature control and neuroprognostication run alongside mine. If there is ongoing ischaemia, haemodynamic or electrical instability, or a strong suspicion of an acute occlusion, I would take them to the lab promptly. If they are stable with no clear coronary cause, angiography can usually be done later on the unit's next list once they are settled.
Because the patient lacks capacity, any decision has to be in their best interests under the Mental Capacity Act. I would speak to the family as soon as possible, both to learn about the person and their wishes and to explain honestly that the main uncertainty is neurological recovery. I would document the reasoning clearly, including why we did or did not proceed immediately, so the next team understands the plan, and I would make sure the referring hospital and ambulance crew know the outcome.
Why this answer works
This answer shows current evidence without overclaiming, a structured hunt for non-coronary causes and joint decision making with intensive care. It also covers best interests and family communication, which panels look for in arrest scenarios. Naming COACT and TOMAHAWK briefly shows you read the evidence without turning the answer into a lecture. Use a real post-arrest patient you have discussed to make it your own.
Key points to include
- No routine immediate angiography without ST elevation
- Assess the arrest circumstances and look for non-coronary causes
- Joint decision with intensive care
- Go promptly if ongoing ischaemia or instability
- Best interests and early family communication
Common mistakes to avoid
- Taking every arrest to the lab regardless of ECG
- Ignoring alternative causes such as dissection or PE
- Making the decision without intensive care input
- Forgetting capacity and best interests
NHS values and standards
Everyone counts; Respect and dignity; Working together for patients. Mental Capacity Act 2005: Best interests.
Further reading
- Resuscitation Council UK Post-resuscitation care guidelines
- ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes (2023)
- Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice
Question 8: A 72 year old man with diabetes and three vessel coronary disease tells you he wants stents, not bypass surgery. How do you approach the decision?
Scenario question · Heart team
What the interview panel is assessing
The panel is assessing your understanding of the heart team process, the evidence comparing PCI and CABG in complex disease, and your ability to share decisions honestly with a patient who has a strong preference. They want balance, respect for autonomy and clear documentation rather than either paternalism or simple compliance.
Model answer
I would start by understanding why he prefers stents. Often it is fear of a big operation, a relative who had a difficult recovery, or worries about being away from a spouse he cares for. Those are legitimate reasons and they shape how I frame the conversation.
Clinically, this is exactly the kind of patient who should be discussed at the heart team meeting with a surgeon and, ideally, an imaging cardiologist. In people with diabetes and multivessel disease, trials such as FREEDOM suggested better long term outcomes with surgery, particularly fewer repeat procedures and heart attacks, though with a higher early stroke risk. But the overall picture depends on his anatomy and complexity, his left ventricular function, his frailty, lung function, kidney function and his own goals. At heart team I would present his preference clearly alongside the anatomy, so the recommendation reflects him and not just the angiogram.
I would then sit down with him, with a family member if he wishes, and go through the heart team recommendation in plain language. I would explain what each option offers: surgery as a bigger upfront operation with a longer recovery but often more complete and durable revascularisation, PCI as a quicker recovery but a greater chance of needing further procedures, and medical therapy as a valid choice for some. I would offer to arrange for him to meet the surgeon, because hearing it from them often addresses fears directly.
If, having understood all of this, he still chooses PCI and it is a reasonable option, I would respect that and document the discussion and his reasons carefully. If his anatomy meant PCI was clearly inferior or unsafe, I would be honest that I could not recommend it, and I would make sure he knew he could seek a second opinion. Either way, the decision should be his, made with full information.
Why this answer works
This answer uses the heart team properly, references key evidence at principle level and keeps the patient's reasons central. It avoids both bullying the patient towards surgery and simply doing what is asked. Offering a meeting with the surgeon is a practical touch panels like. Use a heart team case you have presented, including how the patient's preference was weighed.
Key points to include
- Explore the reasons behind the patient's preference
- Discuss at heart team with surgical input
- Evidence in diabetic multivessel disease at principle level
- Shared decision making including medical therapy
- Respect an informed choice and document it carefully
Common mistakes to avoid
- Agreeing to PCI without heart team discussion
- Dismissing the patient's preference as uninformed
- Quoting trial numbers inaccurately
- Forgetting frailty and comorbidities
NHS values and standards
Respect and dignity; Working together for patients; Everyone counts. GMC Good Medical Practice: Patients, partnership and communication.
Further reading
- ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularisation
- ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes (2024)
- GMC: Decision making and consent (2020)
Ready for the other 32?
You have seen how the model answers work. Unlock the full Interventional Cardiology bank to practise every theme the panel might ask about, with the mistakes to avoid spelled out for each one.
About this NHS interview question bank
To prepare for an interventional cardiology interview in the NHS, practise talking through real cath lab and on call situations out loud: accepting a primary PCI call, cardiogenic shock, out of hospital arrest without ST elevation, perforation and tamponade, access site bleeding, contrast reactions, stent thrombosis and SCAD. Consultant and senior registrar panels will also explore consent after the 2015 Supreme Court consent ruling, heart team decisions, radiation safety, BCIS and MINAP outcome data, duty of candour and how you lead a team in a crisis, so prepare honest examples that show sound judgement, including knowing when not to intervene.
This bank is for doctors preparing for interventional cardiology posts in the NHS: cardiology registrars at ST5 and above, interventional fellows and those applying for consultant posts with a PCI commitment. Each of the 40 original practice questions includes a first-person model answer written at the right grade, what the panel is assessing, key points, common mistakes, the relevant NHS values and GMC domains, and further reading from recognised UK and European guidance. Themes covered include primary PCI and the heart attack network, complications and crisis leadership, consent and shared decision making, heart team, physiology and imaging, radiation safety, outcome data and audit, supervision, revalidation and equality in cardiac care.
What this question bank covers
- Motivation for interventional cardiology
- Primary PCI on call
- Cardiogenic shock
- Cardiac arrest and post-ROSC care
- Complications and tamponade
- Access site bleeding
- Consent and the 2015 Supreme Court consent ruling
- Heart team decisions
- Physiology and intravascular imaging
- NSTEMI pathways
- Antithrombotic therapy
- SCAD
- Radiation safety
- Duty of candour
- BCIS and MINAP audit
- Crisis leadership
- Supervision and teaching
- Revalidation and outcome data
Interventional Cardiology NHS interview: frequently asked questions
What questions are asked in an NHS Interventional Cardiology interview?
NHS Interventional Cardiology interviews usually mix values-based questions with scenarios specific to the role. Typical themes include motivation for interventional cardiology, primary PCI on call, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and post-ROSC care, complications and tamponade and access site bleeding. Every interview panel writes its own questions, so practise the themes rather than memorising answers. The 8 free questions on this page cover a spread of them.
What band is an NHS Interventional Cardiology job?
The questions on this page are pitched mainly at Specialty Registrar ST5+ to Consultant posts. The band for any job depends on the trust and the responsibilities of the post, so always check the advert and job description. Higher bands bring more questions on leadership, supervising others and improving the service.
How should I prepare for an NHS Interventional Cardiology interview?
Read the job description and person specification closely, then prepare five or six real examples you can tell using the STAR method (situation, task, action, result). Revise GMC Good Medical Practice (or the GDC Standards for dental roles), consent and capacity, safeguarding, the duty of candour and patient safety. Research the trust's own values and the service you would join, and practise your answers out loud before the day.
Which NHS values and standards should I mention in a Interventional Cardiology interview?
Link your examples to the NHS values from the NHS Constitution, such as compassion, respect and dignity, and working together for patients. For this role, panels will also expect you to understand GMC Good Medical Practice (or the GDC Standards for dental roles), consent and capacity, safeguarding, the duty of candour and patient safety. Show these through what you actually did rather than reciting lists.
Are these real NHS Interventional Cardiology interview questions?
No. They are original practice questions written to reflect how NHS Interventional Cardiology interviews are typically run. Healthcare Interview Prep is independent and not affiliated with the NHS, and nobody can promise which questions you will be asked. Use the model answers to learn structure and content, then build answers from your own experience.
What do I get if I unlock the full Interventional Cardiology question bank?
You get all 40 Interventional Cardiology practice questions. Each one has what the panel is assessing, a model answer, why the answer works, key points to include, common mistakes and the NHS values it links to. It is a one-off payment of £4.99 for 12 months' access, with no subscription.
Read the full NHS Medical and Dental interview guide →
One-off payment. No subscription. 12 months of access.