top of page

Healthcare Interview Prep

NHS INTERVIEW PREPARATION

Psychiatry - Eating Disorders Interview Questions & Answers

40 original practice questions. Read the first 8 free, then unlock all 40 for £4.99.

← All NHS Medical and Dental interview questions

Last updated 24 October 2026 · Created by a practising NHS doctor · Independent of the NHS

Quick answer

What questions are asked in an NHS Psychiatry - Eating Disorders interview?

NHS Psychiatry - Eating Disorders interviews usually mix values-based questions with scenarios specific to the role. Typical themes include medical risk and MEED, refeeding syndrome, capacity assessment, mental Health Act, family work and confidentiality with young people. Every interview panel writes its own questions, so practise the themes rather than memorising answers. The 8 free questions on this page cover a spread of them.

 

At a glance

  • Role: Psychiatry - Eating Disorders (NHS Medical and Dental)

  • Questions: 40 original practice questions, each with a full model answer

  • Free to read: the first 8 questions and answers on this page

  • Full bank: £4.99, 12 months of access, no subscription

  • Independent: not affiliated with or endorsed by the NHS

 

Read 8 questions in full, free, and see exactly what you get before you pay. Unlock the other 32 for £4.99. One payment, 12 months of access, no subscription. Secure checkout through Stripe.

These are original practice questions written to reflect how NHS interviews are run. They are not leaked or official questions, and Healthcare Interview Prep is independent of the NHS.

 

 

Free NHS interview questions and model answers

 

 

Question 1: Why do you want to work in eating disorder psychiatry, and why with our service in particular?

Motivation question  ·  Motivation

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants a genuine, specific reason for choosing eating disorders rather than general psychiatry, and evidence that you understand how this service is organised. They are also checking that you appreciate the medical, family and emotional demands of the work and will stay committed through slow, non-linear recovery.

 

Model answer

I can trace it back to a young woman I looked after as a core trainee during a liaison shift. She had been admitted to a medical ward with anorexia nervosa, and I remember how anxious everyone was around her. The physicians were worried about her bloods, the nurses were unsure how to supervise meals, and she was frightened and angry. What struck me was how much difference it made when the eating disorder team arrived and calmly pulled everything together: the medical monitoring, a clear meal plan, a conversation with her parents and a plan for the ward staff. I wanted to be the person who could do that.

Since then I have deliberately sought experience. I spent a placement with a community eating disorder team, where I joined family therapy sessions, ran physical health reviews with the nurses and learned to interpret risk in the context of the whole person rather than a single result. I have also completed my MEED training and presented a case at our regional eating disorder network.

What I enjoy most is that this specialty sits right at the edge between psychiatry and medicine. You need to think about physical risk, capacity, the Mental Health Act, family relationships and identity, often in the same conversation. I find that intellectually demanding, and I like that the relationship you build over months genuinely matters to outcomes.

As for your service, I read your annual report and spoke to one of your trainees. I know you offer an early intervention pathway for young adults, intensive day treatment as a step between community and inpatient care, and a close link with the local CAMHS eating disorder team for transitions. That combination of tiers is exactly where I want to develop, because it means patients do not have to become severely unwell before they get intensive help.

I am realistic that progress is often slow and that some days patients will not want me in the room. I would rather be part of a team that holds hope for them during those periods.

 

Why this answer works

This answer starts with one believable clinical moment, then shows the candidate has acted on that interest through placements and training. It names features of the service, which proves research, and closes with realistic expectations. Build yours around your own formative case, and swap in what you genuinely found out about the team you are applying to.

 

Key points to include

  • A specific moment that drew you to eating disorders
  • Evidence you have pursued the interest, such as placements or MEED training
  • What you enjoy about the overlap of medicine and psychiatry
  • Concrete knowledge of this service's pathways
  • Realistic expectations about slow recovery

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Saying you are interested because eating disorders are common, with no personal reason
  • An answer that would fit any psychiatric post
  • Talking only about your own career progression
  • Implying patients are difficult or frustrating to treat

 

NHS values and standards

Compassion; Commitment to quality of care; Improving lives. GMC Good Medical Practice: Knowledge, skills and development.

 

Further reading

  • NICE guideline NG69: Eating disorders: recognition and treatment
  • Medical Emergencies in Eating Disorders (MEED): Guidance on Recognition and Management (Royal College of Psychiatrists)
  • NHS Constitution for England

 

 

Question 2: A GP refers a young adult with a rapidly worsening eating disorder who reports dizziness on standing. How would you assess and manage their medical risk?

Clinical question  ·  Medical risk

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is assessing whether you can apply MEED principles to a real referral: a structured risk assessment that looks at the trajectory as well as the current picture, clear thresholds for escalation set by local and national guidance, joint working with primary care and medical teams, and safe communication with the patient and family.

 

Model answer

My first concern with that referral would be the combination of rapid change and a symptom suggesting physical compromise. In MEED terms, the speed of deterioration matters as much as where someone is today, so I would treat this as urgent rather than routine.

I would arrange to see the person promptly, ideally the same or next working day, and if there was any suggestion of fainting, chest pain or confusion I would advise the GP that they need same day medical assessment in the emergency department. At my review I would take a history focused on intake, fluids, compensatory behaviours, how quickly things have changed and any physical symptoms. I would complete a physical examination including lying and standing observations, temperature, a muscle strength test such as the sit up squat stand, and look for signs of dehydration or poor circulation. I would request bloods and an ECG, and use the MEED risk assessment framework to rate overall risk, remembering that normal bloods do not exclude serious risk.

If the overall picture was high risk, I would not manage that alone. I would discuss with my consultant the same day and agree whether this person needs medical admission, a specialist bed or intensive community support with frequent monitoring. If admission to a medical ward is needed, I would contact the medical team directly, share the MEED guidance on refeeding and physical monitoring, and arrange for our team to in reach to the ward.

Alongside the medical side, I would be talking honestly with the patient. People are often frightened, and some will minimise symptoms. I would explain in plain language why I am worried, what the plan is and what choices they have. With their agreement I would involve family or close friends, because they are often the ones who notice change first.

Finally, I would document the risk assessment clearly, write to the GP with a shared monitoring plan and named responsibilities, and agree a review date. Clarity about who is checking what is often where safety is won or lost.

 

Why this answer works

It works because it prioritises rate of change, uses MEED as a structured framework without relying on single results, and shows senior escalation and joint working with medicine. It also remembers the person behind the numbers. Adapt the detail to a referral you have actually assessed, and describe the local escalation route in your current or target trust.

 

Key points to include

  • Rate of change is as important as current status
  • Structured MEED risk assessment including examination, bloods and ECG
  • Normal bloods do not equal low risk
  • Escalate the same day to the consultant and medical team when needed
  • Clear shared care plan with the GP and named responsibilities
  • Honest, compassionate engagement with the patient and family

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Relying on one measure such as weight or a single blood result
  • Putting the referral on a routine waiting list
  • Forgetting the muscle strength test and lying and standing observations
  • Not considering same day medical assessment for red flag symptoms
  • Vague plans with no named person responsible for monitoring

 

NHS values and standards

Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; Compassion. GMC Good Medical Practice: Patients, partnership and communication.

 

Further reading

  • Medical Emergencies in Eating Disorders (MEED): Guidance on Recognition and Management (Royal College of Psychiatrists)
  • NICE guideline NG69: Eating disorders: recognition and treatment
  • Ignoring the alarms: How NHS eating disorder services are failing patients (Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman)

 

 

Question 3: An adult inpatient with anorexia nervosa is refusing nutrition and becoming medically compromised. How would you approach decisions about capacity and the Mental Health Act?

Scenario question  ·  Capacity and the Mental Health Act

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants to see a careful, lawful and humane approach: assessing capacity properly, recognising how anorexia can affect the ability to weigh information, using the Mental Health Act appropriately for treatment including nutrition, choosing the least restrictive option, and involving the patient, family, advocates and the wider team throughout.

 

Model answer

This is one of the hardest situations in our work, and I would want to slow down enough to get it right, even while the medical risk is pressing.

First I would make sure we understand why she is refusing and whether anything has changed. Sometimes refusal follows a specific trigger, such as a change in meal plan or a difficult visit, and a careful conversation with her key nurse and dietitian can open other options. I would offer choices within the plan wherever possible, such as which supplement or which member of staff supports her, because a sense of control can reduce resistance.

In parallel I would assess capacity for the specific decision about nutrition. Under the Mental Capacity Act I start by assuming capacity. Many people with anorexia can understand and retain information about the risks, but the illness can profoundly affect their ability to use and weigh it, for example when fear of weight gain overrides everything else, or when they believe the risks do not apply to them. I would document her own words carefully, because that is the evidence for my conclusion.

If she is already detained, I would remember that nutrition can be treatment for the mental disorder under the Act, so the question becomes whether nasogastric feeding is the least restrictive and most proportionate option. If she is informal, I would discuss with my consultant whether a Mental Health Act assessment is needed. Either way, decisions about feeding under restraint should be made by the senior team, follow local policy and MEED guidance, involve the medical team about safe refeeding, and be reviewed frequently. I would make sure she has access to an independent mental health advocate and understands her rights.

I would also keep her family informed within the limits she sets, and plan a debrief for her and the staff afterwards. Even when we have to override someone's wishes, how we do it shapes whether she can trust us again.

 

Why this answer works

This answer balances legal accuracy with compassion. It shows a capacity assessment specific to the decision, the link between anorexia and weighing information, the Mental Health Act used proportionately and senior involvement. Replace the details with a case you have been involved in, keeping it fully anonymous, and be ready for follow up questions about advocacy, second opinions and how often such decisions should be reviewed.

 

Key points to include

  • Explore the reasons for refusal and offer choices first
  • Decision specific capacity assessment, with attention to using and weighing information
  • Nutrition can be treatment for the mental disorder under the Mental Health Act
  • Least restrictive, proportionate, senior led decisions following local policy
  • Advocacy, rights and family involvement
  • Debriefs for the patient and staff

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Assuming lack of capacity because of the diagnosis
  • Jumping straight to feeding under restraint without exploring alternatives
  • Confusing the Mental Capacity Act and Mental Health Act frameworks
  • Making the decision alone as a junior or middle grade
  • Ignoring the relationship and trauma impact of restrictive care

 

NHS values and standards

Respect and dignity; Compassion; Commitment to quality of care. GMC Good Medical Practice: Patients, partnership and communication.

 

Further reading

  • Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice
  • Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice
  • Medical Emergencies in Eating Disorders (MEED): Guidance on Recognition and Management (Royal College of Psychiatrists)
  • GMC Decision making and consent

 

 

Question 4: How do you keep a patient's own goals at the centre of care when they do not want treatment for their eating disorder?

Values question  ·  Person-centred care

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is assessing your values: whether you can hold respect and genuine curiosity for someone who is ambivalent, while still being honest about risk. They want to see motivational approaches, shared decision making and an understanding that ambivalence is part of the illness rather than a personal failing.

 

Model answer

I think the first thing is to accept that ambivalence is normal in eating disorders. The illness often feels protective to the person, so when someone says they do not want treatment, I try to hear that as information rather than a barrier. If I go in arguing, they tend to defend the eating disorder more strongly.

In practice I start by asking what matters to them outside the illness. I remember a postgraduate student in a community clinic who was adamant she did not need help. When I asked what she wanted from the next year, she talked about finishing her thesis and being well enough to travel to her sister's wedding. Those became the anchors of our work. When her concentration was failing because of malnutrition, we could link that to her thesis rather than to my worries about her bloods.

I use motivational interviewing principles: reflecting back, rolling with resistance, and helping the person notice the gap between their values and what the eating disorder is doing. I am also honest. If I am worried about medical risk, I say so clearly and explain what I would need to do if things worsened. People generally respect honesty more than reassurance.

Shared decision making matters even when choices are limited. There may be no negotiation about whether monitoring happens, but there can be real choice about when, where and with whom. I write those preferences into the care plan so the whole team respects them.

Finally, I involve the people the patient trusts, with their agreement. Sometimes a partner or friend can say things I cannot. And I try to remember that recovery does not always look like what we expect. For some people with longstanding illness, the most meaningful goal is fewer admissions and a better quality of life, and that deserves to be taken seriously too.

 

Why this answer works

The answer shows values in action through a short, specific example, uses recognised motivational techniques and is honest about where choices end. It also acknowledges different recovery goals. Use a patient you have worked with whose personal goals reshaped the conversation, say what you learned from them, and show how that changed the way you now open first appointments with ambivalent patients.

 

Key points to include

  • Ambivalence is part of the illness, not a personal failing
  • Anchor work to the person's own values and goals
  • Motivational interviewing principles
  • Honesty about risk alongside respect
  • Real choices within necessary boundaries, recorded in the care plan

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Describing patients as non-compliant or manipulative
  • Promising no restrictions will ever be used
  • Offering only abstract statements with no example
  • Ignoring the role of trusted family or friends

 

NHS values and standards

Respect and dignity; Compassion; Everyone counts. GMC Good Medical Practice: Patients, partnership and communication.

 

Further reading

  • NICE guideline NG69: Eating disorders: recognition and treatment
  • GMC Decision making and consent
  • NHS Constitution for England

Found these useful? The other 32 questions cover the rest of the role, each with a full model answer. Unlock all 40 for £4.99.

 

 

Question 5: Can you tell us about a time you worked closely with a medical or paediatric team to care for someone with an eating disorder?

Competency question  ·  Teamwork

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is assessing how you collaborate across specialty boundaries, share expertise without taking over, resolve differences in approach and communicate clearly. They want to see you supporting a team that may be less familiar with eating disorders while keeping the patient safe and the plan coherent.

 

Model answer

As a higher trainee I was asked to see a seventeen year old who had been admitted to a paediatric ward with bradycardia and dizziness. Our CAMHS eating disorder team was involved, but the ward was finding things difficult. Meals were taking a very long time, the young person was walking the corridors a great deal, and staff disagreed about whether to allow her parents to sit with her at meals.

My task was to help the paediatric team create a safe, consistent plan, without undermining their responsibility for her medical care. I started by meeting the consultant paediatrician and nurse in charge. Rather than coming in with a list of instructions, I asked what they were most worried about. Their main concerns were refeeding risk and the stress on nursing staff.

We went through the MEED guidance together, particularly the sections on refeeding, physical monitoring and managing behaviours on the ward. I agreed with the dietitian and the paediatric team who would lead on the meal plan and the monitoring, and I offered practical advice on supporting meals, such as having a consistent member of staff present, setting a clear time limit and a plan for what happens if a meal is not completed. We agreed that her parents could support meals once they had a session with our family therapist. I also offered short teaching for the nursing team on understanding eating disorder behaviours compassionately.

I made sure everything was written in a single shared plan in her notes, and set up a brief daily call between our team and the ward so that issues could be resolved quickly.

Over the following week, meal completion improved, the anxiety on the ward settled and she was discharged with an intensive community package. The feedback from the paediatric consultant was that the clarity of the plan made the biggest difference. What I learned was that listening to the host team first builds trust far faster than arriving as the expert.

 

Why this answer works

A clear STAR structure shows the situation, the candidate's role, specific actions and a measurable result. It demonstrates respect for the medical team's responsibility and practical knowledge of MEED. Choose your own joint working example, ideally one where you improved communication rather than simply giving advice, and include a concrete result such as better meal completion, a shorter stay or positive feedback from the host team.

 

Key points to include

  • Ask the host team what worries them before advising
  • Use MEED guidance as a shared reference
  • Agree clear roles for meal plan, monitoring and behaviour support
  • Single written plan and regular communication
  • Offer teaching to build ward confidence
  • Reflect on what you learned

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Presenting yourself as the expert who fixed everything
  • Criticising the medical team
  • Describing the situation with no outcome
  • Forgetting the family's role in the plan

 

NHS values and standards

Working together for patients; Respect and dignity; Commitment to quality of care. GMC Good Medical Practice: Colleagues, culture and safety.

 

Further reading

  • Medical Emergencies in Eating Disorders (MEED): Guidance on Recognition and Management (Royal College of Psychiatrists)
  • GMC 0 to 18 years: guidance for all doctors
  • NICE guideline NG69: Eating disorders: recognition and treatment

 

 

Question 6: You visit a patient with an eating disorder on a general medical ward and find that the agreed refeeding and monitoring plan is not being followed. What would you do?

Scenario question  ·  Raising concerns

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel wants to see that you act promptly on a patient safety risk, address it directly and respectfully with the team responsible, escalate through the right channels if needed, document and report through incident systems, and think about the system issues behind the lapse rather than blaming individuals.

 

Model answer

My immediate priority would be the patient's safety, so before anything else I would check how she is clinically. I would review her observations, the latest bloods and whether the monitoring set out in the plan has actually been done. If there were signs of refeeding problems or other deterioration, I would speak to the medical doctor on the ward straight away so that it is managed urgently.

Next I would find the nurse in charge and the medical team responsible. I would approach it as a shared problem rather than an accusation. I might say that I have noticed the bloods we agreed have not been repeated and the meal plan does not match what was documented, and ask what has happened. Often the explanation is practical: a handover was missed, the plan was hard to find in the notes, or the ward is very short staffed. I would agree on the spot what needs to happen now, who is doing it and by when.

I would then make sure the plan is easy to follow. That might mean rewriting it clearly, highlighting the MEED monitoring requirements, and putting a copy somewhere the nursing team can see it. I would offer to come back the next day and to give a brief teaching session if that would help.

I would document my review, the concerns and the actions agreed. Because the plan was not followed and there was potential for harm, I would also complete an incident report so that the trust can learn from it. I would let my consultant know, both to share responsibility and in case it needs raising at a more senior level with the medical directorate.

If I found the same problem on my next visit, or if there was harm, I would escalate more formally through the ward manager, the medical consultant and if necessary the trust's patient safety team or Freedom to Speak Up route. I would also talk honestly with the patient about what happened, in line with the duty of candour if harm resulted.

 

Why this answer works

This answer moves in a logical order: immediate safety, a respectful conversation, fixing the system, reporting, then escalation if things do not change. It avoids blame and shows awareness of incident reporting and candour. Bring in an example of a time you raised a concern constructively if you have one.

 

Key points to include

  • Check the patient's safety first and escalate deterioration urgently
  • Raise the issue directly and respectfully with the responsible team
  • Make the plan clear and accessible
  • Document, complete an incident report and inform your consultant
  • Escalate further if the problem persists
  • Duty of candour if harm occurs

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Ignoring it because the patient is under the medical team
  • Blaming individual nurses or doctors
  • Not reporting through the incident system
  • Forgetting to check the patient clinically before anything else

 

NHS values and standards

Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients; Everyone counts. GMC Good Medical Practice: Colleagues, culture and safety.

 

Further reading

  • GMC Raising and acting on concerns about patient safety
  • Medical Emergencies in Eating Disorders (MEED): Guidance on Recognition and Management (Royal College of Psychiatrists)
  • NHS Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)

 

 

Question 7: A seventeen year old patient asks you not to share information with her parents, who are angry that they are being kept in the dark. How would you handle this?

Scenario question  ·  Confidentiality and family work

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is assessing your understanding of confidentiality for young people, the importance of family involvement in eating disorder treatment, the limits of confidentiality when there is serious risk, and your ability to manage strong emotions from both the young person and parents with tact and honesty.

 

Model answer

This tension comes up often, and I would try to resolve it in a way that keeps both the young person and the parents engaged, because family involvement is central to effective treatment for young people with eating disorders.

I would start with the young person. At seventeen she is presumed to have capacity, so her view about confidentiality carries real weight. I would ask what specifically she does not want shared and why. Often it is not everything, but particular things, such as what she has said about her relationship with her mother, or details of compensatory behaviours she feels ashamed about. I would explain that her parents are trying to support her at home, and that they need certain information to do that safely, for example the meal plan and what to look out for. Most young people will agree to some sharing once they feel listened to.

I would also be honest about the limits. If there is a serious risk to her life or health, I may need to share information with her parents even without consent, and I would tell her that before rather than after.

Then I would meet the parents. Their anger usually comes from fear. I would acknowledge how frightening it is to watch a child become unwell, and explain that I cannot share everything she tells me, but that I can share general information about eating disorders, how they can help, and anything she has agreed to. I would also make sure they know how to contact the team and what to do in an emergency, which does not require breaching confidentiality.

Where possible I would bring them together in a family session with our family therapist, because talking openly in a supported setting is often the best way through. I would document what has been agreed about information sharing, review it regularly and start thinking ahead about how this will work as she turns eighteen and moves towards adult services.

 

Why this answer works

The answer respects the young person's rights while recognising the evidence for family involvement, explains the limits of confidentiality and shows empathy for parents. It ends with a practical plan and thinks ahead to transition. Use an example from your own CAMHS or adult experience where you negotiated information sharing.

 

Key points to include

  • Explore exactly what she wants kept private and why
  • Explain why some sharing helps her treatment
  • Be clear about the limits of confidentiality when there is serious risk
  • Validate parents' fear and give general information and crisis plans
  • Use family sessions and document agreements
  • Plan ahead for transition at eighteen

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Telling the parents everything because she is under eighteen
  • Refusing to speak to the parents at all
  • Not explaining the limits of confidentiality in advance
  • Ignoring the evidence for family based treatment

 

NHS values and standards

Respect and dignity; Working together for patients; Compassion. GMC Good Medical Practice: Patients, partnership and communication.

 

Further reading

  • GMC Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information
  • GMC 0 to 18 years: guidance for all doctors
  • NICE guideline NG69: Eating disorders: recognition and treatment
  • Carers Trust: The Triangle of Care

 

 

Question 8: How would you identify and manage the risk of refeeding syndrome in a patient starting nutritional rehabilitation?

Clinical question  ·  Clinical knowledge

 

What the interview panel is assessing

The panel is checking your clinical knowledge at principle level: recognising who is at higher risk, understanding why refeeding problems happen, the need for close monitoring and electrolyte replacement under medical and dietetic guidance, and the balance between refeeding risk and the risk of underfeeding, which MEED highlights.

 

Model answer

Refeeding syndrome happens when nutrition is reintroduced after a period of significant undernutrition. As the body switches back to using carbohydrate, electrolytes such as phosphate, potassium and magnesium move into cells, and levels in the blood can fall sharply. That can cause cardiac, neurological and respiratory complications, so it is a real risk that we have to plan for.

I would identify risk by looking at the whole picture rather than one value. That includes how undernourished the person is, how little they have been eating recently, how quickly they have lost weight, whether there are already electrolyte abnormalities, other medical conditions or alcohol use, and whether they have been purging. MEED gives a structured way of thinking through this, and our local refeeding policy sets out who should be treated as high risk.

Management is multidisciplinary. The dietitian leads on the nutritional plan, the medical team prescribes electrolyte and vitamin supplementation where indicated, and I make sure the psychiatric plan fits with that. Patients need bloods monitored closely in the early days of refeeding, with regular observations and assessment for symptoms such as oedema, confusion or palpitations. Any abnormal results should be acted on promptly by the medical team, following local protocols.

I think it is also important to remember the balance that MEED emphasises. Being too cautious and starting nutrition very slowly can lead to underfeeding, continued weight loss and its own serious complications. The aim is a safe, steady increase with close monitoring, not avoiding nutrition out of fear.

Finally, I would explain all of this to the patient, because their anxiety about eating is often intense. Making it clear why bloods are being taken frequently and what the plan is can reduce distress and help them engage. I would also make sure the handover between teams is clear, because refeeding risk is highest when responsibilities are blurred.

 

Why this answer works

This answer explains the mechanism simply, identifies risk factors without quoting thresholds, shows multidisciplinary roles and highlights the danger of underfeeding, which is a key MEED message. Add a brief example from your own practice of a patient you monitored during refeeding, and mention how you worked with the dietitian and medical team, because panels often follow up by asking who does what.

 

Key points to include

  • Explain the mechanism in simple terms
  • Assess risk using the whole clinical picture and local policy
  • Dietitian, medical team and psychiatry each have clear roles
  • Close monitoring of bloods and symptoms in the early phase
  • Underfeeding is also a risk, as MEED emphasises
  • Explain the plan to the patient to reduce anxiety

 

Common mistakes to avoid

  • Quoting numbers you are not sure are current
  • Suggesting nutrition should be withheld or delayed out of caution
  • Presenting refeeding as purely a medical or purely a psychiatric issue
  • Forgetting to explain monitoring to the patient

 

NHS values and standards

Commitment to quality of care; Working together for patients. GMC Good Medical Practice: Knowledge, skills and development.

 

Further reading

  • Medical Emergencies in Eating Disorders (MEED): Guidance on Recognition and Management (Royal College of Psychiatrists)
  • NICE guideline CG32: Nutrition support for adults
  • NICE guideline NG69: Eating disorders: recognition and treatment

 

 

Ready for the other 32?

You have seen how the model answers work. Unlock the full Psychiatry - Eating Disorders bank to practise every theme the panel might ask about, with the mistakes to avoid spelled out for each one.

 

 

 

About this NHS interview question bank

To prepare for an eating disorder psychiatry interview in the NHS, practise talking through real situations out loud: a rapidly deteriorating referral assessed with MEED, refeeding risk on a medical ward, a patient refusing nutrition where capacity and the Mental Health Act come into play, a family upset about confidentiality, a CAMHS to adult transition and a student moving away for university. Panels for higher trainee, specialty doctor and consultant posts will also explore family work, multidisciplinary leadership, weight stigma, safeguarding and supervision, so prepare honest examples that show calm risk management and compassion.

This bank is written for psychiatrists applying to eating disorder services, including higher specialty trainees, specialty doctors, specialists and consultants in community, day patient, inpatient and liaison settings. Each of the 40 original practice questions includes a first person model answer, what the panel is assessing, why the answer works, key points, common mistakes, linked NHS values and GMC principles, and further reading from recognised UK sources. Themes include medical risk and MEED guidance at principle level, refeeding, capacity and the Mental Health Act, family work and confidentiality, transition, ARFID and neurodiversity, type 1 diabetes, inequalities and weight stigma, restrictive practice, leadership, quality improvement and revalidation.

 

What this question bank covers

  • Medical risk and MEED
  • Refeeding syndrome
  • Capacity assessment
  • Mental Health Act
  • Family work
  • Confidentiality with young people
  • CAMHS to adult transition
  • Shared care with GPs
  • ARFID
  • Autism and eating disorders
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Suicide and self-harm risk
  • Weight stigma and inclusion
  • Restrictive practice and dignity
  • Severe and enduring illness
  • Multidisciplinary leadership
  • Quality improvement
  • Appraisal and revalidation

 

 

Psychiatry - Eating Disorders NHS interview: frequently asked questions

 

What questions are asked in an NHS Psychiatry - Eating Disorders interview?

NHS Psychiatry - Eating Disorders interviews usually mix values-based questions with scenarios specific to the role. Typical themes include medical risk and MEED, refeeding syndrome, capacity assessment, mental Health Act, family work and confidentiality with young people. Every interview panel writes its own questions, so practise the themes rather than memorising answers. The 8 free questions on this page cover a spread of them.

 

What band is an NHS Psychiatry - Eating Disorders job?

The questions on this page are pitched mainly at Higher specialty trainee (ST4 to ST6), specialty doctor, specialist and consultant posts. The band for any job depends on the trust and the responsibilities of the post, so always check the advert and job description. Higher bands bring more questions on leadership, supervising others and improving the service.

 

How should I prepare for an NHS Psychiatry - Eating Disorders interview?

Read the job description and person specification closely, then prepare five or six real examples you can tell using the STAR method (situation, task, action, result). Revise GMC Good Medical Practice (or the GDC Standards for dental roles), consent and capacity, safeguarding, the duty of candour and patient safety. Research the trust's own values and the service you would join, and practise your answers out loud before the day.

 

Which NHS values and standards should I mention in a Psychiatry - Eating Disorders interview?

Link your examples to the NHS values from the NHS Constitution, such as compassion, respect and dignity, and working together for patients. For this role, panels will also expect you to understand GMC Good Medical Practice (or the GDC Standards for dental roles), consent and capacity, safeguarding, the duty of candour and patient safety. Show these through what you actually did rather than reciting lists.

 

Are these real NHS Psychiatry - Eating Disorders interview questions?

No. They are original practice questions written to reflect how NHS Psychiatry - Eating Disorders interviews are typically run. Healthcare Interview Prep is independent and not affiliated with the NHS, and nobody can promise which questions you will be asked. Use the model answers to learn structure and content, then build answers from your own experience.

 

What do I get if I unlock the full Psychiatry - Eating Disorders question bank?

You get all 40 Psychiatry - Eating Disorders practice questions. Each one has what the panel is assessing, a model answer, why the answer works, key points to include, common mistakes and the NHS values it links to. It is a one-off payment of £4.99 for 12 months' access, with no subscription.

Read the full NHS Medical and Dental interview guide →

One-off payment. No subscription. 12 months of access.

bottom of page